14 ALLS 12(2):13-20
teachers to teach French grammar consistent with the social
constructivist approach.
Therefore, the main goal of this research is to dene how
learners build instructional sequences based on the Euro-
pean Common Language Reference Framework (CEFR)
and action-oriented methods by using authentic documents
including metalanguage. In particular, it aims to focus on:
1. Progress means understanding of meaning. Teaching the
sequence order more specically describes the existence
of conditions and their formation and use.
2. We will analyze and compare the approach to the French
Present Conditional, and second, we will analyze the
context of the procedure teaching and the prole of the
learners to whom it will be passed.
3. The article aims to show that teaching French as a sec-
ond foreign language to design grammar teaching mate-
rials based on social-constructivist activities. Learning
is considered a creative action by the learner.
4. Finally, at the end of these introductory analyzes, which
are important for the development of an audience-spe-
cic learning sequence, we will create a sequence guide
with additional activity sheets for learners.
THE FRENCH PRESENT CONDITIONAL: FROM
METHODICAL GRAMMAR TO FSL METHODS
The Didactic Process
Before developing a didactic sequence, the documental gen-
esis which consist of authentic material should not be lim-
ited to copying the contents of French teaching textbooks
or Internet sites without critical thinking. It is necessary
to learn grammar beforehand to analyze the differences
between these works and the way in which the methodology
of FSL. This allows the teacher to analyze the shortcomings
and especially adjust the sequence to the needs of the learn-
ers, hence the choice of content is an important part of the
didactic process. Social constructivists assume that the real-
ity cannot be directly assumed, but the people can construct
their view based on the knowledge they already have. There-
fore, the learner learns about them by contacting with others
(Duffy&Jonassen,1992). A social constructivist approach is
based on building new knowledge rather than directly trans-
fer it (Bodner,1986; Sherman, 2000). In this perspective,
knowledge can be created in three different stage. These
stages are assimilation, regulation and balance (Cunningham
& Piburn, 1997). It is aimed that students reach information
by researching and questioning with constructivism based
on foreign language education. In this context, we can dene
constructivist approach as meaningful learning that a learner
accomplishes by establishing a relation between existing
knowledge and new knowledge. In this way of learning, it is
important to carefully design learners’ acquisition methods.
Teaching the French Present Conditional: From
Professional Grammar to FSL Methods
The Present Conditional is not a tense of the indicative
mode. According to Grosse and Grévisse (2016: 980), it is
“a special future, a future in the past, or a hypothetical future
(later or at least following the fact expressed (…) in a con-
dition proposal”. Goose and Grévise emphasize (2016: 980)
“the verbs of The Present Conditional ending with -er do not
appear in innitive form and the endings -ais, -ais, -ait, etc,
but the indicative in the rst person of the singular presents
the endings -rais, -rais, rait. For example, in Le Nouveau
Taxi 2 or the Alter Ego 2 teaching guide, The Present Condi-
tional is created with the Future Tense stems and The Imper-
fect Tense endings. However, the Future Tense in textbooks
is described only on the basis of the innitive. Therefore, it
seems insufcient for it does not work for many verbs whose
stems change. For example, to conjugate the verb “acheter”
(to buy), we take the innitive of the verb and add the Future
Tense endings (acheter-ais). For many verbs, the stem con-
sists of the innitive of -er: j’achete-r-ais. Regarding to the
verbs ending with -ir or -re, Goose and Grévise (2016) remark
that the The Present Condition is formed with the innitive,
and the last -e in the innitive form of the verbs ending with
-re is removed before the endings of The Imperfect Tense
is added (for example, lir-ais). It is not lire-ais, nir-ais,
mettr-ais. In Le Nouveau Taxi and Alter Ego 2, there is no
description of the conditional form of verbs ending in -ir or
-re. Finally, two other groups of verbs are mentioned, each
of which requires a special formation of the condition. The
rst group concerns certain verbs from the rst group “- éer,
- ier, -ouer, - uer, - yer”, for which cannot be above -e before
the conditional ending (the same for the future) (Grousse
and Grévisse, 2016: 980). In the French language teaching
methods, this formation does not exist, neither in Alter Ego 2
nor Le nouveau Taxi 2. However, it seems important because
it concerns verbs used at A1 and A2 levels, such as: acheter
(buy), payer (pay), louer (rent), etc. The second group con-
cerns some verbs, such as acquérir (to acquire), courir (to
run), envoyer (to send), mourir (to die), pouvoir (to be able)
and voir (see) for which it is doubled -rr in condition (and
in the future). However, there aren’t any subject concerns
with this formation in the FSL methods. Riegel, Pellat, Rioul
(2009: 444) describes methodical grammar “the formation of
The Present Conditional of the verb should be used from the
rst-person plural of the present indicative” (nous devons,
je dev-r- ais).
In the guidance and conceptualization stage, we will
retain the adaptations of the descriptions of “Le Bon Usage”
and “La grammaire méthodique du français” : the verbs of
the rst type of verb -er, focusing on maintaining the verbs
-éer, -ier -e,- ouer, -uer, -yer and verbs, use the rst person
plural to form The Present Conditional. We will also demon-
strate the -ir and -re verbs. Finally, we will introduce some
special forms (auxiliary être and avoir in the future and con-
ditions).
The Use of The Present Conditional
Regarding to the application of the present condition, Riegel,
Pellat, and Rioul (2009: 555-561) list the categories of the
present condition: conditional temporal, conditional modal
(a hypothesis with two values depending on the point of view
of the unreal situation speaker of present and potential). Also,