18 NEV. L.J. 1089, CHASE - FINAL 5/30/18 2:29 PM
Spring 2018] BLACK LIVES MATTER 1107
In Klayman v. Obama, Larry Klayman, a former prosecutor from Florida,
filed a class action lawsuit on behalf of “police officers and other law enforce-
ment persons of all races and ethnicities” for threats of violence and attacks on
police officers.
123
In the amended complaint, filed in September, 2016, Black
Lives Matter was named as a defendant, along with Garza, Cullors, Tometi, and
others that have associations to Black Lives Matter.
124
Other named defendants
included Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Eric Holder (the former Attorney
General), the New Black Panthers Party, Reverend Al Sharpton, and the Nation
of Islam.
125
The case is currently pending in the Northern District of Texas, and
many of the parties have filed motions to dismiss on a wide variety of
grounds.
126
But regardless of the outcome, this case signals a stark contrast to
traditional legal battles associated with past civil rights movements. Unlike the
hard-fought civil rights cases from the 1850s through the 1970s, such as the
Dred Scott case,
127
Plessy v. Ferguson,
128
and Brown v. Board of Education,
129
the legal system does not seem to carry the weight that it once did for the Black
Lives Matter movement. At this point, Klayman v. Obama is the one of a small
number of legal actions that Black Lives Matter has been involved in, and simi-
lar to the other cases, the merits of Klayman seemingly have not warranted se-
rious response from any of the defendants.
130
This shift away from legal action
speaks volumes about the priorities of the Black Lives Matter movement, as
well as a shift in attitude about the trustworthiness of the legal system in gen-
eral.
In spite of the general avoidance of legal action by Black Lives Matter, the
movement has also found its way into the courtroom in other ways. In Las Ve-
gas, Nevada and Youngstown, Ohio, criminal defense attorneys have been held
in contempt for wearing Black Lives Matter pins in the courtroom, and refusing
123
Amended Complaint at 4, Pennie v. Obama, 3:16-CV-02010 (N.D. Tex. 2017).
124
Id.
125
Id.
126
Pennie v. Obama, 255 F. Supp. 3d 648, 652 (N.D. Tex. 2017).
127
Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857).
128
Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896).
129
Brown v. Bd. of Educ., 347 U.S. 483 (1954).
130
These cases usually involve very broad legal attacks on BLM based on the conduct of
individual members. See Logan v. Black Lives Matter Org., No. 6:16-2599-TMC-KFM,
2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 186561, at *1, *7 (D.S.C. Aug. 30, 2016), reviewed in Civil Action
No. 6:16-2599-TMC, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71771, at *2 (D.S.C. May 11, 2017) (involving
allegations of racist remarks by members of BLM); see also Smith v. McKesson, No. 17-
00429-BAJ-RLB, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 178408, at *12 (M.D. La. Oct. 27, 2017); Doe v.
McKesson, 272 F. Supp. 3d 841, 855 (M.D. La. Sept. 28, 2017). Also, one suit was filed by
an individual, purportedly on behalf of BLM, though it turned out not to be an actual action
on behalf of BLM, nor was it sanctioned or organized by BLM or its founders. Black Lives
Matter v. Trump, No. 3T7-MC-003, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 197240, at *1 (S.D. Tex. July
19, 2017) (the case information sheet indicated “Black Lives Matter” as the filing party, the
pleadings identified the plaintiff as “Pro Se Plaintiff Slave Negro Louis Charles Hamilton
II”).