Sw
BUS 4438 BUSINESS ETHICS
COURSE SYLLABUS – FALL 2012
Course Period:
Mondays 6:00 pm - 9:00 pm
Sept. 10 - Oct. 22
Instructor: Mark D. Reno
Contact Info: [email protected]
Classroom: 2R07
Office: It is best to arrange an
appointment ahead of time.
OVERIEW
This course is designed to provide students with opportunities to apply ethical reasoning
to the demands of business management. We will analyze select readings and case studies
to explore key ethical principles and the various ways in which business practitioners and
ethical theorists address the issues that commonly arise in the business world.
OBJECTIVES
to enhance students ethical awareness and appreciation of the complexity of ethical
decision making in business organizations
to develop students' analytical skills for understanding and resolving ethical issues
to facilitate student self-understanding of themselves as ethical agents
OUTPUTS
By the end of the c
ourse students will
demonstrate r
eading, reflection, and comprehension of key ethical principles, concepts,
and approaches
demonstrate an ability to identify and analyze ethical issues, conflicts, and
responsibilities in business contexts
construct and communicate rational, responsible, and realistic responses to ethical
issues
demonstrate a critical awareness of their own values and morality
Students will exhibit this through
pre-class preparation and substantive contribution to class discussions and activities
(30%)
a written analysis of a code of ethics from a business setting (20%)
a take-home examination that uses key ethical principles to analyze a recent
business ethics case in the news (50%)
OUTCOMES
develop skills to analyze, assess, and address ethical conflicts and dilemmas in
business cases
comprehend the need for ethics in business and three key ethical approaches
develop a clear sense of one's own moral obligations and personal responsibilities in
pursuing a career and the factors that will challenge and change one's moral compass
acquire courage to make principled choices in the face of ethical challenges
COURSE READING MATERIAL
Textbook: Business Ethics - Concepts, Cases, and Canadian Perspectives, Kissick, W.P. (2012)
Business 4438 Readings and Cases – available from Ivey Publishing.
CLASS SCHEDULE
Unit 1a: Sept. 10th
Awareness of Moral Issues & Ethical Standards
“Know yourself” (forecourt inscription, Temple of Apollo at Delphi)
5HDGLQJ “What is Business Ethics and Why Study It?” - Kissick Text, 3-12
'LVFXVVLRQ&RXUVH2XWOLQHDQG2ULHQWDWLRQ
Unit 1b: Sept. 10th
Awareness of Moral Issues & Ethical Standards
Reading: "Theories of Ethics- Kissick Text, 13-26
Discussion: "Business Ethics in the News" - Various Authors
Unit 2a: Sept. 17th Ethical Reasoning & Decision-Making
Utilitarian Ethics
“The outcome justifies the deeds” (Ovid)
Reading:
“Utilitarianism: Weighing Social Costs and Benefits” by Valsquez, 60-71
Case:
“Pinto Madness,” by Mark Dowie
“The Pinto Case and the Rashomon Effect, Patricia Werhane
What better ways are there to make the kinds of decision Ford made?
Unit 2b: Sept. 17th Ethical Reasoning & Decision-Making
Reading
“Utility and Utilitarianism” by DeGeorge, 55-75
Case
“Profit Maximization and Layoffs” by Mary Gentile
Unit 3a: Oct. 1st
Deontology / Universal Duties
“An unexamined life is not worth living” (Socrates)
Reading:
Critical Thinking for Business Ethics- Kissick Text, 27-40
"Making Ethical Decisions" - Kissick Text, 119-135
Discussion:
Advertising is Too Prevalent- Rusking & Schor
Advertising is Not Too Prevalent" - Wall Street Journal
Assess these authors' opposing arguments.
Reading:
An Introduction to Stakeholder Analysis- Kissick Text, 43-59
Case:
Conflicts of Interests in Subprime Mortgages and at Enron" - Desjardins
Address the case discussion questions.
Unit 3b: Oct. 1st
Deontology / Universal Duties
Case: “Jess Smith and the Design Firm” - Neeley, Wicks, & Mead
What should Jess Smith do?
Unit 4a: Oct. 15th
Reading: A Kantian Approach to Business Ethics- Bowie, 3-16
“Sneakers and Sweatshops”
-
Schilling
Address the case discussion questions.
Unit 4b: Oct. 15th Deontology / Universal Duties
The Social Contract
Any of you who does not like us and the city, and who wants
to go to a colony or to any other city, may go where he likes,
and take his goods with him (Socrates)
Reading: "Systems of Moral Evaluation" - Salazar, 29-34
Case:
Unit 5a: Oct. 22nd
Reading: Excerpts From A Theory of Justice- Rawls, 498-512
Discussion:
"Some Costs of American Corporate Capitalism" - Kasser et al
Assess the pros and cons of American Corporate Capitalism from a
social contract perspective.
Reading: “Utility and Utilitarianism” - DeGeorge, 55-75
Case: “Profit Maximization and Layoffs” - Gentile
Address the case discussion questions.
Utilitarian Ethics
Unit 5b: Oct. 22nd The Social Contract
Reading:
“Ethical Leadership” - Kissick Text, 105-118
“Viewpoint: On Being an Ethical Executive” by McCallum, 1-7
Discussion:
The Ivey Ring Pledge
Identify and be prepared to discuss the ethical principles that inform
each of the statements of The Ivey Ring Pledge.
EVALUATION OF STUDENT WORK
Component (detailed below)
Percentage
Due Date
Class Contribution
30%
Throughout course period
Analysis of a Business Code of
Ethics
20%
Due by: TBA
Take-home Examination
50%
Due by: TBA
Total
100%
Class Contribution (30%)
The primary criteria for evaluating student contribution to class is based on evidence of
pre-class preparation, engagement during class, and the nature and content of comments
within class discussions. We do not value quantity of comments so much as quality
of comments – that is, lots of comments that leave the class unfocused are not as valued as
highly as well-directed comments that move discussions forward. This is described in
more detail below.
Analysis of a Business Code of Ethics (20%)
This assignment will require you to find a code of ethics from a North American corporation
(most are published online) and to analyze it in light of the relevant moral principles discussed
(i.e., Utilitarianism; Deontology; and Social Contracts) and identify which, if any,
moral principle(s) have guided the production of the code of ethics. For this assignment you
may want to focus on more well-developed codes of ethics, perhaps even choosing one from
a business sector within which you are interested in working. Your write-up should take the
form of a short essay or a memo (not to exceed 4 pages, 1.5 spacing) and should focus on
analysis not description or summary of the codes. Your assignment can be submitted to me
via email at [email protected].
Due by: TBA
Take-home Examination on Ethical Reasoning (50%)
The take-home examination will require you to identify and analyze a recent business case in
the news (within the past 5 years) involving ethical issues. Further details will be provided in the
last week of the course. Your assignment can be submitted to me via email at [email protected]
Due by: TBA
COURSE POLICIES
Attendance
Attendance at all sessions in this course is mandatory. Circumstances may arise which
make it impossible for you to attend; for example, if you are unable to attend a class due to
health-related reasons. As a matter of professional courtesy, I expect you to inform me
about your absence in advance. There is no way to make up your contributions for a
missed class. Under University regulations, the professor can determine at what point
absenteeism has become excessive and thus can prevent you writing the final exam
(www.uwo.ca/univsec/handbook/exam/attend.pdf ). If you miss 30% or more of the
course (that is 2 or more classes) you cannot have fully mastered the material, and thus
you will be barred from taking the final exam. This makes it extremely likely that you
will receive a failing grade in the course which will prevent your completion of the
requirements for the HBA program.
Academic Integrity
Students are expected to abide by the values and practice of Academic Integrity.
Departures from Academic Integrity are serious academic offences and may result in a
range of penalties. Students are advised to acquaint themselves with Western University's
Scholastic Offense Policy in the Western Academic Calendar. Plagiarism is a major
academic offence. All submitted work, including essays, assignments, exams, and
reports, must be the student's own work or must accurately reference any and all ideas or
quotations used from other sources, including internet sources.
All required work may be subject to submission for textual similarity review to the
commercial plagiarism detection software under license to the University for the
detection of plagiarism. All papers submitted will be included as source documents in the
reference database for the purpose of detecting plagiarism of papers subsequently
submitted to the system. Use of the service is subject to the licensing agreement,
currently between The University of Western Ontario and Turnitin.com
(www.turnitin.com).
Disability Policy
If you have a physical, psychological, or learning disability and might require
accommodations in this course, please contact immediately Western's Student
Development Services (see http://www.sdc.uwo.ca/ssd/).
Assessment of Class Participation
Effective contribution to the learning environment incorporates a variety of behaviors:
Preparation – your contributions should demonstrate that you have read the
materials carefully and have come prepared with thoughtful questions and reactions.
Critical Thinkingyour contributions should demonstrate an ability to analyze the
core ideas and practices and you articulate the underlying assumptions.
Reasoning – you should use evidence and logic in shaping arguments and your
comments should be on topic and make the point concisely (i.e., you should not
hold the floor for too long). You should avoid comments that fail to add to the
conversation (e.g., “me too” comments).
Listening – you should be attentive to the comments of others in the class and show
open-mindedness and respect toward other points of view. Your own comments
should not interrupt others who are speaking nor should you carry on side
conversations with your neighbours.
Respect – your demeanor in the classroom should reflect respect for the professor,
guests, and your classmates. Computers should be used only for purposes directly
relevant to the tasks at hand (e.g., looking up background information or checking
facts). Playing games, trading stocks, and other non-class relating computer
activities distracts other students and interferes with their learning, as does texting
on phones and taking and receiving phone calls (turn off your cell phone!).
Professionalism – your contribution to the class is about more than what you say; it
is about your attitude to the learning process, your willingness to engage with the
material, and accepting personal responsibility for the progress of the class. Some of
the issues that we will discuss in class may prove to be sensitive to some of your
peers. It is imperative that you respect the positions taken by others, even while
disagreeing with them. Derogatory comments and off-colour jokes or jibes will not
be tolerated in the class.
3/3 You demonstrate careful, concise, critical analysis through clear and brief comments
based on the material at hand. Your comments reveal a willingness to explore beyond
the initial learning situation. You add to the flow of the discussion by building on
others‟ comments or by redirecting the discussion into other critical areas, sharing
your expertise (knowledge, skill, aptitude), posing questions, constructively criticizing,
and summarizing the main learning points. You foster a positive learning environment
for the class by engaging in a conversational tone that opens up avenues of exploration
and shows respect for the opinions and positions of others while not necessarily
agreeing with them.
2/3 You demonstrate a good analysis and some critical reasoning alongside a reasonable
understanding of the relevant issues arising from the material. Your comments reveal
an understanding of the relationship or connections among the core concepts. You
need to be more concise or precise in details and more careful in articulating
arguments. You give intelligent and intelligible responses to the core issues and to
positions taken by other students.
1/3 You demonstrate an understanding of the basic facts, vocabulary, details, and
elemental concepts arising from the material. Your comments reveal some
understanding of the subject and show an ability to deal with simple issues arising out
of the material. You need to engage the subject matter more fully and formulate ideas
more clearly. Students whose comments fit into the higher categories but who show
disrespect for other students will receive this grade for participation.
0/3 Failure to attend class without a documented excuse (e.g., doctor' note, late arrival,
early departure, and frequently leaving class for short periods compromises the
learning the learning environment for yourself and others and will result in this grade
for a given day. Rude or disruptive behaviour in the large or small group work will
also garner this grade.
Assessment of Written Work
Wow!
A+
Distinguished
Exceeds
expectations for
this assignment
for students at
the graduate or
undergraduate
level.
A
Outstanding
A-
Excellent
Meets
expectations for
this assignment
for students at
the graduate or
undergraduate
level.
B+
Accomplished
B
Good
Below
expectations for
this assignment
for students at
the graduate or
B-
Fine
undergraduate
level.
C+
Developing
C
Adequate
C-
Marginal
Ouch!
F
Inadequate