1
Michigan Trial Court Standards for Courtroom Technology (rev. 9/22)
Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 1
Section 1: Standards for Digital Video and Audio Recording
Chapter 1: Governing Authority .................................................................................... 1
Chapter 2: Recording Equipment and Technology Standards ....................................... 3
Chapter 3: Operating and Monitoring Procedures ......................................................... 13
Section 2: Standards for Video Conferencing Technology
Chapter 1: Governing Authority .................................................................................... 25
Chapter 2: Equipment and Technology Standards ......................................................... 34
Chapter 3: Testing Procedures and Scheduling Remote Participants ............................ 36
Chapter 4: Videoconferencing Participation by Attorneys and Witnesses .................... 42
2
Section 1: Standards for Digital Video and Audio Recording
Chapter 1: Governing Authority
These standards and guidelines are established to ensure that courts purchase, maintain, and
operate recording systems that are designed to meet the special requirements of courtroom
recording. They include standards for: 1) governance, 2) equipment and technology, and 3)
operating and monitoring the recording of proceedings.
Requirements which may be especially challenging for court to comply with are:
Recording equipment and technology standards, specifically the requirements for:
o Reliability and Security: redundancy to ensure that a recording is captured in the
event of failure of a storage device (see Chapter 2, item G); to mitigate this, courts
should make copies of the recording immediately following the hearing,
o Integration: the ability of a system to be integrated with other PC-based
utilities and importing recordings from external sources (see Chapter 2, item
H), and
o Videoconferencing: direct feed into the recording system (see Chapter 3, item C,6).
Storage standards, specifically the requirements for Storage: backup (see Chapter 2, item D).
A.
Recording Equipment and Technology
Trial courts are authorized to use audio and video recording equipment for making a record
of court proceedings. If a trial court uses audio or video recording equipment for making the
record of court proceedings, it shall use only recording equipment that meets the standards
as published by the State Court Administrative Office or analog equipment that the State
Court Administrative Office has approved for use. MCR 8.109(A). Control and care of
recording media is governed by 3.3.2.3 Court Recordings, Log Notes, Jury Seating Charts,
and Media of the Michigan Trial Court Records Management Standards.
B.
Equipment Operation
Trial courts that use audio or video recording equipment, whether digital or analog, must
adhere to the audio and video recording operating standards published by the State Court
Administrative Office pursuant to MCR 8.109(B). Only reporters, recorders, voice
writers, or operators certified pursuant to MCR 8.108(G)(1) may operate a court’s audio
recording system. A person operating a court’s digital video court recording system need
not be certified pursuant to MCR 8.108 but must comply with these standards.
Trial courts must also adhere to 3.3.2.3 Court Recordings, Log Notes, Jury Seating Charts,
and Media of the Michigan Trial Court Records Management Standards. Section 3,
Chapter 8 and Section 4 of the Manual for Court Reporters and Recorders outlines
procedures for operating audio recording equipment, logging the proceedings, and marking
3
exhibits. Chapter 3 of these standards outlines procedures for operating video recording
equipment, logging the proceedings, and marking exhibits.
C.
Transcription and Delivery of the Record
Digital recording enables the courts to establish a transcript management system that
efficiently and effectively manages the life cycle of transcripts from initiation of the
transcript request through the electronic or paper distribution and filing of the transcript.
Courts should establish clear responsibility and procedures to manage the transcription
production process. See also Section 3.3.2.3 of the Michigan Trial Court Case File
Management Standards.
D.
Records Management
All records associated with the recording of court proceedings, regardless of format, belong
to the court, must remain in the physical possession of the court, and are subject to access in
accordance with MCR 8.119(H). MCR 8.108(C) and (D) govern the maintenance and
storage of records created by a court reporter, court recorder, or electronic operator. Records
associated with the recording of court proceedings are defined in MCR 8.119(F) and include
the recordings, log notes, jury seating charts, and all other records such as tapes, backup
tapes, discs, and any other medium used or created in the making of a record of proceedings
and kept pursuant to MCR 8.108. See also Section 3.3.2.3 of the Michigan Trial Court
Records Management Standards.
E.
Access to Records
Access to records defined in MCR 8.119(F) is governed by MCR 8.119(H)(2)(b) and must be
regulated by policy and procedures established through local administrative order. Model
LAO 8 must be used as the basis of this policy.
F.
Scope
The term “judge” applies to district court magistrate and referee.
4
Michigan Trial Court Standards for Courtroom Technology
Section 1:
Standards for Digital Video and Audio Recording
Chapter 2: Recording Equipment and Technology Standards
(rev. 9/22)
Chapter 2: Recording Equipment and Technology Standards
A.
Components
Digital systems record a court proceeding and store the recording in a single digital file.
These systems generally incorporate three types of components:
Dedicated hardware -- workstations, servers, disk and tape drives, etc. that are
dedicated to the system.
Proprietary hardware -- video and sound-processing equipment (video capture cards,
mixers, voice processors) is often developed by the vendor and often cannot be
replaced with off-the-shelf components.
Proprietary software -- the software used to operate the system will have many
proprietary components but may also accomplish some of its functions through
generally available utilities and programs. The customer may be able to select certain
components, based on which functions of the system are desired.
B.
System Design
Systems vary widely in design. Some operate on a standalone personal computer (PC), while
others take advantage of the benefits of network technology. Other systems may use digital
components as additions to videocassette-based system architecture. Courts should consider
the benefits of each approach, as well as the vulnerabilities and costs of each design.
To guarantee that a court will be able to choose from many system vendors, and to ensure
that a system is able to grow and take advantage of new technologies, the system must adopt
an open-architecture design. This approach enables different vendors to supply different
parts of the overall system. As such, device interfaces must conform to industry standards.
Required:
Open architecture: A system must use an open-architecture approach, using devices
with standard interfaces.
Compatibility with peripherals: A system must support standard peripheral devices
used in transcription, such as foot pedals and headphones, using industry-standard
interfaces.
C.
Video Recording
The core function of digital recording systems is to convert the audio and video signals from
the various microphones and cameras into a digital format and store it as a computer file.
5
Michigan Trial Court Standards for Courtroom Technology
Section 1:
Standards for Digital Video and Audio Recording
Chapter 2: Recording Equipment and Technology Standards
(rev. 9/22)
Some systems allow multichannel sound recording (as many as four), which allows the
voices of individual speakers to be isolated on playback. This improves transcript accuracy
when two or more people are speaking at the same time.
Required:
Audio/video recording: A system must record the audio and video of a court’s proceedings
and store the recording in a digital format with a continuous time stamp.
Optional:
Record playback: Some systems are capable of playing back a portion of the recording
while continuing to record.
D.
Storage
Digital recording systems create a computer file, usually on the computer’s hard drive.
However, the permanent (archive) file is created by copying the file on the hard drive to
some other, often external, medium or by simultaneously recording the audio and video
signals to a standard videocassette tape. This may be done manually or automatically by the
system. These digital media fall into two categories: magnetic and optical. Examples of
magnetic storage media are floppy disks, DAT tapes, and JAZ drives. Optical media include
compact disks and DVDs. Some optical media can be written to only once, but read many
times (WORM), while others can be rewritten (RW). Magnetic media can be rewritten.
Required
Recording format: A system must store the converted audio and video signals in an open,
publicly available (nonproprietary) digital format. Examples include WAV, M-JPEG,
MPEG I, and MPEG II. Lossy compression algorithms (in which the decompressed file does
not contain all the information present in the original file) are permitted if they do not detract
from the playback quality of the file or inhibit the creation of a complete, true, and correct
transcript.
Long-term backup: A system must create a backup of the files (and annotations database if
applicable) for disaster recovery.
Long-term storage medium: A system must archive the permanent copy of the digital
recording on a widely available, industry-accepted medium that can be stored separately
from the system. Both magnetic and optical media are allowed, but a DAS/NAS/SAN digital
storage system is recommended due to its durability, redundancy capability, and more
advanced technology.
6
Michigan Trial Court Standards for Courtroom Technology
Section 1:
Standards for Digital Video and Audio Recording
Chapter 2: Recording Equipment and Technology Standards
(rev. 9/22)
The long-term storage location must be kept at a separate physical location from the long-
term backup location. The files maintained at the two separate locations must be retained for
the same amount of time in accordance with the General Records Retention and Disposal
Schedule #16 – Michigan Trial Courts.
Optional
Find and restore: Some systems provide a means of tracking and locating material that has
been moved to long-term storage. (See “Organization” in Appendix A of this chapter.)
E.
Playback and Transcription
After recording and storage, the digital files will need to be transferred to the transcriptionist.
In many cases, only part of a day’s proceedings will need to be transferred. Systems must be
able to replay a recording so that the court can create a transcript of the proceedings. Most
systems provide a separate software utility designed to play back the recording.
Required
Nonproprietary transfer medium: Any medium used to transfer the digital recordings to
transcriptionists must be a widely available, industry-accepted medium (e.g., CD, JAZ, DAT,
etc.) so they can replay the recording on readily available equipment.
Access: A system must be able to access a digital recording using rewind, fast forward,
search by timestamp, and other direct access methods to enable a system operator to quickly
find passages of interest.
Playback quality: A system must play the recording back at a sufficient quality level to
enable the preparation of a complete, true, and correct transcript. Playback quality will be
determined by the customer.
Voice isolation: A system must be able to isolate the voices of speakers who speak
simultaneously.
Separate volume controls: A system must provide separate volume controls for each
channel.
Optional
Selection of material: A system may have the ability to identify recorded material that
needs to be sent to the transcriptionist, or the user may develop a process to extract this
information. (See “Organization” in Appendix A of this chapter.)
7
Michigan Trial Court Standards for Courtroom Technology
Section 1:
Standards for Digital Video and Audio Recording
Chapter 2: Recording Equipment and Technology Standards
(rev. 9/22)
Peripherals: Some vendors may supply transcriptionists with the peripheral devices (e.g.,
CD-ROM or DVD drive, foot pedal, etc.) necessary to produce the transcript.
File Transfer Protocol (FTP): A system may allow transfer of digital files via FTP from a
DAS/NAS/SAN as needed.
F.
Annotations
Many systems include an integrated note-taking utility, which allows the system operator to
take notes that are tied to time stamps marking particular sections of the recording. Although
an integrated note-taking utility can enhance the efficiency of a digital recording system, it is
not central to its functioning and is therefore not required. However, if a system includes
such a utility, it must permit the editing of the notes after they have been taken.
Required
Editing annotations: An integrated note-taking utility must allow notes to be changed after
they have been made, either through system functionality or by exporting, editing in a
different program, and importing them back into the system.
Optional
Session setup: The system may provide utilities useful in preparing to record a session, such
as entering the date and time, courtroom, judge, and case number for the case about to be
recorded.
Customization: This is the ability to make configuration choices that will affect the use of
the system by all users, as well as to make changes to the interface that are specific to each
session.
Multiple annotators: Some systems provide a utility that allows users other than the court
recorder to take notes and link them by time stamp to the recording.
Search annotations: This is the ability to search through the annotations to find specific
material to play back.
Highlight current tag: Some systems may highlight the annotations corresponding to the
audio/video as it is played back.
G.
Reliability and Security
Because court recording is mission critical, equipment used in performing this function must
be reliable. Systems need to provide operators with various forms of information that
indicate that the system is functioning properly.
Michigan Trial Court Standards for Courtroom Technology
Section 1:
Standards for Digital Video and Audio Recording
Chapter 2: Recording Equipment and Technology Standards
(rev. 9/22)
7
Because digital recording systems rely on PCs, security becomes an issue. Courts should
rely on their existing computer security policies and apply them to digital recording systems.
Required
Live channel indicators: A system must continuously monitor all microphones and cameras
and provide at least visual indication that each is picking up a signal. An audible alarm, in
addition to a visual indicator, is desirable.
Confidence monitoring: A system must continuously monitor the storage medium and
provide at least visual indication to the operator that the signal is being recorded.
Redundancy: To ensure that the recording is captured in the event of failure of a storage
device, a system must store the signal to two separate storage devices simultaneously. One
may be used as the emergency backup.
Audio pause indicator: A system must periodically produce an audible alarm when the
system has been put in pause or mute mode, such as during an off-the-record bench
conference, to alert the operator to resume normal operation when the conference has ended.
Optional
Security and privileges: The system may be configured to allow different levels of access
to different users.
Identify edited files: The system may allow the user to determine whether audio/video or
text files (if the system contains a note-taking utility) have been edited or otherwise changed
since they were created. The system may also be able to indicate whether copies of files are
identical to original files created by the system.
H.
Integration
The ability of a system to be integrated with other PC-based utilities will protect courts in the
event that the system becomes unusable, obsolete, or no longer supported by the vendor. The
degree of integration also presents opportunities to use a digital recording system more
effectively by incorporating audio or audio/video recordings from depositions, other
hearings, etc.
Required
Accessibility of data by nonsystem utilities: Because the storage format must be
nonproprietary, it follows that the files must be able to be read by nonsystem software
utilities.
Michigan Trial Court Standards for Courtroom Technology
Section 1:
Standards for Digital Video and Audio Recording
Chapter 2: Recording Equipment and Technology Standards
(rev. 9/22)
8
Optional
Importing recordings from an external source: This is the ability of a system to integrate
nonsystem recordings into the digital system. This accommodates recordings of testimony or
other records created using a different system.
Importing case data: Some systems may allow the user to import case information (case
name, number, parties, etc.) into the recording system, avoiding the need for manual entry of
the information.
I.
Administration
Digital recording systems often provide a number of tools that make using the system easier.
Optional
User setup: A system may include utilities to allow users to identify themselves on the
system (e.g., usernames and passwords).
Management reports: A system may provide utilities that generate basic reports on the
status and content of the system files (and annotations database if applicable), which is useful
in identifying frequency and patterns of use, needs for training, and storage capacity
planning.
9
(rev. 9/22)
Appendix A
Factors When Considering a Purchase
Organization
How will the files created by the system be stored: by case? by day?
How will the court track the location of files?
How will files be named?
How does the digital video system support these operational processes?
User interface
How intuitive and accessible is the system’s interface?
How much training will be required to use the system?
Sufficient field length
Does the system allow sufficient space in the data fields to store the necessary
information?
On-line capacity
How much data can be stored on the system’s local drive? How many cases/days does
this represent?
Off-line storage
What storage medium options are available for backing up the local data?
How efficient is the storage medium (how much data can you store on a given disk, tape,
etc.)?
Duplication speed
How long does the system’s tape duplicator take to transfer a given file to an analog tape?
Maintenance functions
Can users perform tasks necessary to maintain the system (defining network settings and
disk structures, correcting interfaces, rebuilding databases, etc.), or must the vendor
perform them?
Vendor Support
Will the vendor provide a free analysis of the components needed to provide the level of
functionality the court desires, prior to the sale?
Will the vendor install the system, including network interfaces, and test it?
Will the vendor train court staff on the operation and maintenance of the system?
What type of support will the vendor provide after installation?
Does the purchase or maintenance agreement include any future upgrades?
10
(rev. 9/22)
Appendix B
Checklist for Compliance with Standards; Form SCAO 56
(rev. 9/22)
13
Chapter 3: Operating and Monitoring Procedures
A.
Administrative Responsibilities
To effectively capture, preserve, and produce a record of court proceeding, court
administrators and judicial leadership should establish and manage the digital recording
program by applying these standards and by adopting courtroom practices that ensure all
persons responsible for setting up, operating, and monitoring the recording equipment and all
participants in and out of the courtroom fulfill their responsibilities. This includes making
sure everyone involved complies with the equipment and technology standards, preserves the
recording as required by these standards, and produces and distributes the transcripts as
required by law and court rule. In addition, administration should determine what signage
will be used throughout the court facility and ensure that operators are using the signage
appropriately in the courtroom.
B.
Authorized Operator
1.
Digital Audio Equipment Operator
Only reporters, recorders, or voice writers certified pursuant to MCR 8.108(G)(1) may
record proceedings held in Michigan. An operator holding a CEO certification under
MCR 8.108 (G)(7)(b) may also record proceedings.
Required operating and monitoring procedures for digital audio equipment are outlined in
the Manual for Court Reporters and Recorders, Section 3, Chapter 8 and Section 4.
2.
Digital Video Equipment Operator
a.
Authority, Conduct, and Qualifications
Any person operating a court’s digital video court recording system must comply
with these standards. The operator need not be certified pursuant to MCR 8.108.
Operating and monitoring procedures for digital video equipment are outlined in this
chapter.
The video operator shall comply with all statutes and court rules and is subject to the
court’s code of conduct for court employees.
In general, the video operator should possess a broad understanding of court
procedures and principles, familiarity with legal terminology, specific knowledge
related to the digital audio recording equipment, and awareness of courtroom
decorum.
(rev. 9/22)
14
b.
Responsibilities
In general, the video operator is responsible for:
assisting in microphone placement,
monitoring the recording (not the source) through headphones to ensure the
proceedings are being recorded properly,
taking and maintaining log notes and relevant lists of attorneys’ names and
addresses, witnesses, exhibits, and other information to assist with transcription,
playing back recorded court proceedings as directed by the judge, and
ensuring that the recording is properly stored and archived at the court.
In addition to the logging and monitoring procedures in this chapter, the court should
make clear to the video operator any other procedures expected, such as marking of
exhibits and swearing in of witnesses in the courtroom, maintaining evidence, and
making entries into the court’s case management system for such things as the start
and end time of each hearing, all appearances, court orders, and next hearing dates.
c.
Training
The video operator must receive initial hands-on start-up training and follow-up
training from the digital recording vendors and court staff on start-up procedures and
advanced features of the system.
The video operator should also be trained by court personnel on courtroom
procedures and storage responsibilities, including: 1) logging procedures; and 2)
basic training on microphone use and placement, equipment set-up, operation and
maintenance, failure recovery, troubleshooting, backup and restore procedures, and
routine inspection procedures.
In some courts, the video operator may also be responsible for transcript processing
and should be trained as such.
C.
Setup and Testing
The video operator assigned to the courtroom is responsible for observing the following
procedures and performing the associated setup and testing tasks. Whether this is done at the
beginning of the day or before each proceeding depends on the scheduling practices of the
court and local practices.
(rev. 9/22)
15
1.
Supplying the Courtroom
Make sure that all necessary supplies for producing a recording, making log notes,
marking exhibits, and preserving the record are available and accessible. Supplies could
include headphones, the court calendar and docket, pens, pencils, legal pads, blank
appearance sheets and witness and exhibit lists, and compact disks for archiving.
2.
Posting Signs
Make sure signs are prominently posted that provide notice to all attendees and
participants that conversations occurring in the courtroom may be recorded at any time.
3.
Instructing Attorneys
The operator or judge shall give written instructions to each attorney in each proceeding
to be held in the courtroom that day. When observed, the instructions ensure that the
audio recording of the proceedings is clear and legible. See Appendix A of this chapter
for a checklist.
4.
Testing the Equipment
a.
Test the recording and log notes software for their operating functions.
b.
Test the recording quality of each microphone and the wiring by speaking into each
microphone and listening to the recorded result on each audio channel. Problems
can be caused by the microphones not being plugged into the proper channels or
equipment, or not being set on the record mode. Report any problems so that they
can be fixed before the day’s proceedings.
c.
If default settings are used, check whether the system has been set back to the
appropriate default setting and, in particular, that the setting accurately identifies the
name of the judge presiding in that courtroom over the recorded proceeding.
5.
Arranging Microphones
a.
Check the microphone and camera placement for each courtroom according to type
of case and the flow and movement of the participants.
b.
Assign a foreign-language interpreter’s microphone to a separate channel.
(rev. 9/22)
16
c.
Jury voir dire requires flexible placement of microphones. Use of wireless
microphones is recommended for optimum flexibility.
6.
Videoconferencing
If videoconferencing technology is being used, it should be fed directly into the
recording system. If this feature is not available, move a microphone to a position near
the speaker through which the video conferencing dialogue will be emitted.
7.
Telephonic Participation
If a party is participating in a proceeding through telephonic means in accordance with
MCR 2.004, feed the telephone conversation into the courtroom through a speaker box.
Place the microphone next to the speaker.
8.
Making Arrangements with Judge
Determine how the judge wants to be notified or interrupted by the operator during the
court proceeding in the event the record of the proceedings is not being captured.
D.
Operating the Equipment
The operator must operate the equipment as directed by the judge and in accordance with
these standards. A verbatim record must be recorded pursuant to law and Michigan court
rules, and conversations may be muted or not recorded only as authorized by these standards.
Logging and monitoring procedures are outlined in item G (see page 18).
1.
Off-the-Record Discussions and Sidebar or Bench Conferences
The recording should be stopped for off-the-record discussions only at the direction of
the judge and only for as long as the judge directs. Sidebar or bench conferences are
part of the official record and must be recorded unless the judge orders otherwise.
2.
Confidential Communications
All conversations of attorneys and parties that occur in the courtroom are to be recorded.
Microphones should be equipped with mute buttons to permit attorneys and parties to
communicate confidentially. The judge should notify all participants of the mute feature
at the start of a proceeding (see item F, page 17).
(rev. 9/22)
17
E.
Shutdown Routine
Storing and archiving the recording at the court must be done in compliance with
Components 23 and 24 of the Michigan Trial Court Case File Management Standards and
local court practices.
1.
Backup the day’s recordings to the court’s network. If the system does not enable this,
backup the day’s recordings onto a compact disk (CD).
2.
Label the recordings to enable their retrieval during the retention period.
3.
Res
et the system to the appropriate default setting for the next day’s
proceedings.
4.
Shut down the court recording system.
F.
Courtroom Checklist for Judge
The judge shall, at the start of each proceeding:
1.
Verify with the operator that the system has been tested and is operating.
2.
Advise participants that the court proceeding is being electronically recorded.
3.
Advise participants to speak loudly and clearly.
4.
State each case by name, number, and type of proceeding each time a case is called.
5.
Advise all participants to properly identify themselves when making their appearance at
the beginning of each proceeding and to spell their names for the record.
6.
Advise attorneys to give their appearances at the start of each day of a continuous,
multiday trial.
7.
Advise attorneys to take necessary precautions (i.e., cover the microphone or use the
mute button) when they wish to consult with clients during the hearing.
8.
Mention that coughing or sneezing near a microphone will adversely affect the recording.
9.
Advise attorneys to speak into a microphone, and monitor this during the proceeding.
(rev. 9/22)
18
10.
Advise participants that only one person should speak at a time and remind them, as
necessary, to discourage overlapping questions and answers or colloquy.
11.
Advise speakers not to wander around the courtroom unless wireless microphones are
used.
12.
Conduct on-the-record bench conferences at the bench conference microphone.
13.
Leave the bench microphone turned on while in session except for off-the-record
discussion.
14.
Clarify any nonverbal occurrences such as “witness nodded head,” indicating a yes
response.
15.
Address jurors by name or number for proper identification during voir dire.
G.
Logging and Monitoring Procedures
The video operator must produce the clearest possible recording of proceedings and must
keep a written (handwritten, typed, or system-generated) log of events in the proceeding. In
general, log notes serve three purposes: 1) to locate a specific proceeding, 2) to locate a
specific portion of the proceeding, and 3) to aid the transcriber in preparing the transcript.
See Appendix B of this chapter for a list of entries that should be made into the log notes
to aid transcription of the record.
1.
Logging
a.
Minimum Content
For all court proceedings, the log notes must contain:
1)
Names
Log the full name of the judge, case caption, case number, and the names and
spellings of the parties and attorneys present. When possible, the operator should
ask the attorneys to supply a list of names and terms before the court session.
2)
Time
Log notes must allow the video operator and transcriber to identify the beginning
and end time of each proceeding. The digital recording software should ideally
be able to automatically insert into the system the beginning and end time, along
with any time that the recording is paused, started, or stopped. In court sessions
where proceedings overlap, the video operator will need to be particularly diligent
(rev. 9/22)
19
at logging start and stop times and may not be able to rely on the software to do
so.
3)
Spelling and Unusual Names and Terminology
To assist transcription and playback, log notes should include the spelling of
uncommon words, proper nouns, or unusual phrases or jargon.
4)
For Trials and Evidentiary Hearings
When trials and evidentiary hearings are held, log notes must also contain:
a)
The name of each witness.
b)
The beginning of each type of examination (e.g., direct examination, cross-
examination, redirect examination, recross examination, opening statement,
closing argument, rebuttal).
c)
Exhibits (clearly mark the exhibit number and describe the evidence
admitted).
d)
Any other information that would assist transcription. Commonly used
abbreviations may be useful.
b.
Identifying Speakers by Channel
Because speakers may move to and speak from multiple microphones during the
proceeding, the video operator may need to develop a code to ensure that the log
notes contain, and the transcriber can identify who is speaking on any one channel
at any one time. Some video systems do this automatically.
A standard setup for channel allocation could serve as a useful guide for transcribers
in the majority of cases. For example:
Channel 1: Judge/Jury/Bench or Well
Channel 2: Witness
Channel 3: Defendant
Channel 4: Plaintiff
When a jury trial is being held, the term “voir dire” should be entered into the log
notes at the beginning of voir dire.
(rev. 9/22)
20
c.
Language Interpreters
Log notes on when the interpreter is interpreting and the identity of the speaker
whose words are being interpreted are particularly important.
d.
Abbreviations
Abbreviations are acceptable for commonly understood standard terms; (e.g., “def”
for “defendant”).
e.
Telephonic Participation
Enter a log note at which time the telephone conversation begins and identify the
person(s) involved in the call.
f.
Audiotape and Videotape Sources
Attorneys may on occasion play audiotaped or videotaped materials during the
course of the proceedings. In such instances, follow these procedures.
1)
If the playback of the audiotape or videotape is to be recorded:
a)
Enter a log note on the log "videotape (or audiotape) of (whatever it is)
played in court."
b)
Move a microphone to a position near the speaker through which the recorded
material will be played.
c)
Log as much as possible to help the transcriber with speaker and content
identification.
d)
Enter a log note at which time the playback of the audiotape or videotape
concludes.
2)
If the playback of the audiotape or videotape is not to be recorded:
a)
Enter a log note describing the material played back off-the-record and turn
the recording equipment off.
b)
When the playback of the audiotape or videotape is completed, make certain
that the recording equipment is turned back on and resume.
(rev. 9/22)
21
g.
In-Court Playback of Testimony
When asked to play back testimony or some other portion of the proceedings
document the start and end time in the log notes (the time will be entered
automatically). See item G.3. on page 22 for further details.
2.
Monitoring
a.
Using Headphones
To ensure that the proceedings are being adequately and intelligibly recorded, using
headphones the video operator must monitor what is being recorded onto the audio
channels, not what is being said into the microphones. This is known as “confidence
monitoring.” The system should provide at least visual indication to the operator that
the signal is being recorded.
b.
Interrupting Proceedings
The video operator should strive for an unobtrusive presence. Because an
interruption may not be desirable at a critical point in testimony, the video operator
must use best judgment in interrupting proceedings. Interruptions should be made
only as necessary and in accordance with protocols established with the judge.
Situations where it may be necessary to interrupt proceedings are to request:
The correct spelling of names or technical or unfamiliar names.
That a party move closer to the microphone.
That the person stop tapping a microphone or shuffling papers too close to it.
That a nonverbal response be made audible.
That a party slow down his or her speech pattern.
The video operator must interrupt the proceeding and notify the judge when a record
is not being made, such as technical failure of the equipment or the speaker’s words
are inaudible for reasons including:
The audio level of the recording is not adequate.
The parties are speaking too softly or too rapidly.
The parties are talking simultaneously over each other.
Excessive shuffling of papers.
(rev. 9/22)
22
A microphone remains muted.
Excessive gallery or extraneous noise.
c.
Sidebar or Bench Conferences
Sidebar or bench conferences are often whispered; therefore, it is important to
monitor the volume and to ensure that the recording equipment is picking up each
speaker. If a conference is off-the-record, the operator should make certain to record
the judge announcing that it is off-the-record and resume recording when the
conference is over.
d.
Jury Voir Dire
Video operators may need to be particularly vigilant with asking potential jurors to
speak up.
3.
In-Court Playback of Testimony
There are a number of circumstances where the operator may be asked to play back
testimony or some other portion of the recording. The recording system should support
immediate resumption after playback, with no interruption in the proceedings. However,
some systems do not have playback capabilities (cannot playback and still record the
proceeding in the courtroom).
The operator's goal should be to locate and play back requested portions of testimony as
quickly as possible. When a request is made to play back a certain portion of the
proceedings from a digital recording, the procedures are to:
Note the request in the log notes (the time will be entered automatically).
Change the panel from the recording screen to the playback screen.
Find the requested portion and listen through the headset to make sure you have the
appropriate portion requested.
Play the requested portion.
Note on the log that playback was concluded (the time will be entered automatically).
Change the panel back to the recording screen and continue with the proceedings.
23
(rev.9/22)
Appendix A
Checklist of Responsibilities for Attorneys and Participants in the Courtroom
1.
Inform your clients of the recording method and take necessary precautions to protect
disclosure of confidential communications during proceedings.
2.
When speaking for the first time, identify yourself for the record. Spell your name and state
whom you represent.
3.
Provide the video operator with the correct spellings of unusual or technical names and words
used by you or your witnesses.
4.
Do not move the microphones.
5.
Always remain within arm’s reach of a microphone. If you approach the bench, wait until
you are within arm’s reach of a microphone before speaking again.
6.
For the benefit of the written record, try to avoid speaking while witnesses or other counsel
are speaking. Only one person should speak at a time.
7.
Address jurors by name or number for proper identification during voir dire.
8.
Avoid “uh-huh,” head nods, and gestures. Solicit verbal responses from all witnesses.
9.
Avoid shuffling papers or making other noises when people are talking. If you have a cold,
move away from the microphone before coughing or sneezing.
10.
Use the mute button while consulting with your client or making any statements that you do
not want recorded. Be sure the mute button is off, and the microphone is on before
proceeding.
11.
When at a bench conference, avoid blocking the microphone with documents. Speak one at a
time into the sidebar microphone.
12.
On days where there are multiple cases set for hearing, hold discussions outside the
courtroom or at least away from microphones.
24
(rev.9/22)
Appendix B
Recommended Log Note Entries for Proceedings Requiring Transcription
a.
Date
b.
Courthouse
c.
Courtroom
d.
Reporter
e.
Case number
f.
Case name
g.
Judge
h.
Attorneys (contact information)
i.
Type of hearing
j.
Opening statement
k.
Witness name
l.
Witness called
m.
Witness excused
n.
Objections
o.
Court’s ruling on objection
p.
Addresses
q.
Key words (spellings)
r.
Proper nouns (spellings)
s.
Exhibits
t.
Recess
u.
Court resumes
v.
Direct examination
w.
Redirect examination
x.
Cross examination
y.
Recross examination
z.
Rebuttal
aa. Surrebuttal
bb. Voir Dire
cc. Judge
dd. On the record
ee. Off the record
ff. Commence judge’s ruling
gg. Closing argument
hh. Jury instructions
ii. Verdict
jj. Request for playback of testimony
kk. Playback
ll. Bench conference
mm. Bench conference begins
nn. Bench conference ends
Michigan Trial Court Standards for Courtroom Technology
Section 2: Standards for Videoconferencing Technology
Chapter 1: Governing Authority
(rev. 9/22)
25
Section 2: Standards for Videoconferencing Technology
Chapter 1: Governing Authority
These standards and guidelines are established to: 1) ensure consistency in videoconferencing
practices and procedures throughout the state of Michigan; 2) improve service to the public,
other agencies, and the judiciary; and 3) improve the performance and efficiency of
videoconferencing in the courts.
Videoconferencing (or two-way interactive video technology) is defined as interactive
technology that sends video, voice, and data signals over a transmission circuit so that two or
more individuals or groups can communicate with each other simultaneously using video codecs,
monitors, cameras, audio microphones, and audio speakers.
Facilities and Technology Management
A. Establishment of Videoconferencing Standards
Videoconferencing (or two-way interactive video technology) is defined as interactive
technology that sends video, voice, and data signals over a transmission circuit so that two or
more individuals or groups can communicate with each other simultaneously using video
codecs, monitors, cameras, audio microphones, and audio speakers. MCR 2.407(A)(2).
The Michigan Supreme Court ordered that the State Court Administrator establish
videoconferencing standards to: 1) ensure consistency in videoconferencing practices and
procedures throughout the state of Michigan; 2) improve service to the public, other agencies, and
the judiciary; and 3) improve the performance and efficiency of videoconferencing in the courts.
The appellate and trial courts are required to conform to the standards, and the State Court
Administrative Office is required to enforce the standards and assist courts in adopting practices to
conform to those standards. Michigan Supreme Court Administrative Order 2014-25. See Section
2 of the Michigan Trial Court Standards for Courtroom Technology.
B. Types of Proceedings Authorized to Use Videoconferencing
All proceedings occurring by videoconferencing, including the manner and extent of the use of
videoconferencing, are subject to requirements, standards, and guidelines published by the State
Court Administrative Office and the criteria set forth in subrule (C). MCR 2.407(B)(1).
Trial courts are authorized to use videoconferencing technology pursuant to MCR 2.004, MCR
2.305, MCR 2.407, MCR 2.408, MCR 3.210(A)(4), MCR 3.215(D)(3), MCR 3.705, MCR
3.708, MCR 3.904, MCR 4.101, MCR 4.202, MCR 4.304, MCR 4.401, MCR 5.140, MCR
6.006, MCR 6.104, MCR 6.901, MCR 9.112, MCR 9.115, and 9.221. For a list of Authorized
Michigan Trial Court Standards for Courtroom Technology
Section 2: Standards for Videoconferencing Technology
Chapter 1: Governing Authority
(rev. 9/22)
26
Uses for Videoconferencing, see Section 2, Appendix A of the standards.
C. Provisions for Participation
1. A judicial officer presiding by videoconferencing must be in a courthouse as required by
Supreme Court Administrative Order 2012-7, unless otherwise authorized by local
administrative order.
2. Participants shall be able to see, hear, and communicate with each other.
3. Participants shall be able to see, hear, and otherwise observe any physical evidence or
exhibits presented during the proceeding.
4. In criminal and delinquency matters, counsel for a defendant/juvenile shall have the
option to be physically present with the client at the remote location, and the facilities at
the remote location shall be able to accommodate counsel’s participation in the
proceeding from the remote location.
5. In criminal and delinquency matters, if a defendant/juvenile and counsel are not in each
other’s physical presence, they shall be able to have private, confidential communication
during the proceeding.
6. If applicable, there shall be a means by which documents can be transmitted between the
courtroom and the remote location.
D. Verbatim Recordings
All proceedings that are held using videoconferencing technology or communication
equipment must be recorded verbatim by the court with the exception of hearings that are
not required by law to be recorded.
E. Criteria for Determining Use
In determining in a particular case, the use of videoconferencing technology and the manner
of proceeding with videoconferencing, the court shall consider:
1. The capabilities of the court and the parties to participate in a videoconference.
2. Whether a specific articulable prejudice would result.
Michigan Trial Court Standards for Courtroom Technology
Section 2: Standards for Videoconferencing Technology
Chapter 1: Governing Authority
(rev. 9/22)
27
3. The convenience of the parties and the proposed witness(es), the cost of producing the
witness in person in relation to the importance of the offered testimony and the
potential to increase access to courts by allowing parties and/or their counsel to appear
by videoconferencing technology
4. Whether the procedure would allow for full and effective cross-examination, especially
when the cross-examination would involve documents or other exhibits.
5. Whether the court has reason to believe that the participants in this hearing will not
be able to maintain the dignity, solemnity, and decorum of court while using
videoconferencing technology, or that the use of videoconferencing technology will
undermine the integrity, fairness, or effectiveness of the proceeding.
6. Whether a physical liberty or other fundamental interest is at stake in the proceeding.
7. Whether the court can sufficiently control the participants in this hearing or matter so as
to effectively extend the courtroom to the remote location.
8. Whether the use of videoconferencing technology presents the person at a remote
location in a diminished or distorted sense that negatively reflects upon the individual at
the remote location to persons present in the courtroom.
9. Whether the person appearing by videoconferencing technology presents a significant
security risk to transport and be present physically in the courtroom.
10. Whether the parties or witness(es) have waived personal appearance or stipulated to
videoconferencing.
11. The proximity of the videoconferencing request date to the proposed appearance date.
12. Any other factors that the court may determine to be of relevance to the proceeding.
F. Request for and Objection to Videoconferencing and Participant Contact Information
1. Request
a) A participant may request to physically appear in person for any proceeding. If
there is a request to appear in person, or a participant is found to be unable to
adequately use the technology, to hear or understand or be heard or understood,
the presiding judge and any attorney of record for said participant must appear in
person with the participant for said proceeding. Subject to MCR 2.407(B)(5),
Michigan Trial Court Standards for Courtroom Technology
Section 2: Standards for Videoconferencing Technology
Chapter 1: Governing Authority
(rev. 9/22)
28
b) the court must allow other participants to participate using videoconferencing
technology.
c) A participant who requests the use of videoconferencing technology shall ensure
that the equipment available at the remote location meets the technical and
operational standards established by the State Court Administrative Office.
c) A participant who will be using videoconferencing technology must provide the
court with the participant’s contact information, including mobile phone
number(s) and email address(es), in advance of the court date when
videoconferencing technology will be used. A court may collect the contact
information using a SCAO-approved form. The contact information form used
under this provision shall be confidential. An email address for an attorney must
be the same address as the one on file with the State Bar of Michigan.
2. Objection
If an objection is made to the use of videoconferencing technology, the court shall
consider the factors in MCR 2.407(C) in making its ruling.
Michigan Trial Court Standards for Courtroom Technology
Section 2: Standards for Videoconferencing Technology
Chapter 1: Governing Authority
(rev. 9/22)
29
Appendix A - List of Authorized Uses for Videoconferencing
Court Proceedings: Videoconferencing means the use of an interactive technology,
including a remote digital platform, that sends video, voice, and/or data signals over a
transmission circuit so that two or more individuals or groups can communicate with each
other simultaneously using video codecs, monitors, cameras, audio microphones, and audio
speakers. It includes use of a remote video platform through an audio-only option.
1. Circuit - Civil
(a) Civil Videoconferencing is allowed for the following proceedings:
Appearance of a party or witness for a discovery subpoena under MCR 2.305
Hearings regarding Personal Protection Order (PPO) under MCR
3.705(B)(3)
Violation of PPO hearings under MCR 3.708
Domestic relations proceedings involving minor children (custody and
guardianship) in which a party is incarcerated under MCR 2.004
Domestic relations referee hearings under MCR 3.215(D)(3)
Generally, a court may, at the request of a participant, or sua sponte, allow
the use of videoconferencing technology by any participant in any civil
proceeding. MCR 2.408(A)(1)
(b) Civil Videoconferencing technology is presumed for the following proceedings
[MCR 2.408(B)]:
Civil pretrials
Early scheduling conferences under MCR 2.401(B)
Discovery motions under MCR 2.119
Adjournments
Modification to scheduling orders
Motions in limine
Post-judgment collections or discovery
Testimonial proofs for hearings under MCR 3.210(A)(4)
Motions to correct, strike or amend pleadings
Summary disposition motions under MCR 2.116
(c) Civil Videoconferencing technology is prohibited for the following
proceedings:
Bench trials or jury trials or any proceeding wherein the testimony of
witnesses or presentation of evidence may occur, except in the discretion of
the court after all parties have had notice and
Michigan Trial Court Standards for Courtroom Technology
Section 2: Standards for Videoconferencing Technology
Chapter 1: Governing Authority
(rev. 9/22)
30
opportunity to be heard on the use of videoconferencing technology. [MCR
2.408(A)(2)]
2. CircuitCriminal
(a) Criminal Videoconferencing is allowed for the following proceedings:
Juveniles charged with specified offenses under MCR 6.901
Generally, a court may, at the request of a participant, or sus sponte, allow
the use of videoconferencing technology by any participant in any criminal
proceeding. MCR 6.006(A)(2). Circuit courts may use the videoconferencing
technology to conduct any non-evidentiary or trial proceeding. MCR 6.006
(b) Criminal Videoconferencing technology is preferred for the following
proceedings [MCR 6.006(B)]:
Initial arraignments on the information
Pretrial conferences
Motions under MCR 2.119
Pleas
(c) Videoconferencing technology is prohibited for the following proceedings:
Bench trials or jury trials, or any proceeding wherein the testimony of
witnesses or presentation of evidence may occur, except in the discretion of
the court, after all parties have had notice and opportunity to be heard on the
use of videoconferencing technology. [MCR 6.006(B)(4)]
3. Circuit - Family Division
(a) Family DivisionVideoconferencing technology is allowed for the following
proceedings:
Child protective and juvenile guardianship proceedings by any participant
under MCR 3.904(B)
Testimony from an expert witness or any person in removal hearings,
evidentiary hearings, and termination of parental rights proceedings if
requirements of MCR 3.904(B) are satisfied.
Hearings regarding juvenile Personal Protection Orders (PPOs) under MCR
3.705(B)(3).
Violation of PPO hearings under MCR 3.708(I)
Michigan Trial Court Standards for Courtroom Technology
Section 2: Standards for Videoconferencing Technology
Chapter 1: Governing Authority
(rev. 9/22)
31
Domestic relations proceedings involving minor children (custody,
guardianship, neglect, foster-care placement, and termination of parental
rights) in which a party is incarcerated under MCR 2.004
Domestic relations referee hearings under MCR 3.215(D)(3)
Delinquency, designated & PPO violation proceedings involving a juvenile
under MCR 3.904(A), including:
o Preliminary hearings under MCR 3.935(A)(1)
o Preliminary exam under MCR 3.953 and MCR 3.985
o Post-dispositional progress reviews
o Dispositional hearings where court does not order more restrictive
placement or treatment
o Testimony from an expert witness or any person if requirements of
MCR 3.904(A) are satisfied.
Generally, a court may, at the request of any participant, or sua sponte, allow
the use of videoconferencing technology by any participant in any civil
proceeding under MCR 2.408(A)(1)
(b) Family Division Videoconferencing technology is presumed for the following
proceedings [MCR 2.408(B)]:
Civil pretrials
Early scheduling conferences under MCR 2.401(B)
Discovery motions under MCR 2.119
Adjournments
Modification to scheduling orders
Motions in limine
Post-judgment collection or discovery matters
Testimonial Proofs for hearings under MCR 3.210(A)(4)
Motions to correct, strike or amend pleadings
Summary disposition motions under MCR 2.116
(c) Family Division - Videoconferencing technology is prohibited for the following
proceedings:
Bench trials or jury trials, or any proceeding wherein the testimony of
witnesses or presentation of evidence may occur, except in the discretion of
the court, after all parties have had notice and opportunity to be heard on the
use of videoconferencing technology. [MCR 2.408(A)(2)]
Michigan Trial Court Standards for Courtroom Technology
Section 2: Standards for Videoconferencing Technology
Chapter 1: Governing Authority
(rev. 9/22)
32
4. DistrictCivil
(a) Civil - Videoconferencing technology is allowed for the following proceedings:
Land contract forfeiture. MCR 4.202(H)(3)
Small claims proceedings. MCR 4.304
Generally, a court may, at the request of any participant, or sua
sponte, allow the use of videoconferencing technology by any participant in
any civil proceeding. MCR 2.408(A)(1)
(b) Civil Videoconferencing technology is presumed for the following proceedings
[MCR 2.408]:
Civil pretrials
Early scheduling conferences under MCR 2.401(B)
Discovery motions under MCR 2.119
Adjournments
Post-judgment collection matters
Motions to correct, strike, or amend pleadings
Contested civil infractions under MCR 4.101
(c) Civil Videoconferencing technology is prohibited for the following
proceedings:
Evidentiary hearings, bench trials or jury trials, or any proceeding wherein
the testimony of witnesses or presentation of evidence may occur, except in
the discretion of the court, after all parties have had notice and opportunity to
be heard on the use of videoconferencing technology [MCR 2.408(A)(2)].
5. District Criminal
(a) Criminal Videoconferencing is allowed for the following proceedings:
Generally, a court may, at the request of any participant, or sua sponte, allow
the use of videoconferencing technology by any participant in any criminal
proceeding. MCR 6.006(A)(2)
Witness testimony in a preliminary examination (as long as defendant is
present in the courtroom or waived the right to be present). MCR
6.006(C)(4).
Juveniles charged with specified offenses subject to the jurisdiction of the
district court under MCR 6.901
Michigan Trial Court Standards for Courtroom Technology
Section 2: Standards for Videoconferencing Technology
Chapter 1: Governing Authority
(rev. 9/22)
33
(b) Criminal Videoconferencing technology is preferred for the following
proceedings [MCR 6.006(C)(1)]:
Arraignments and probable cause conferences for in custody defendants.
(c) Criminal - Videoconferencing technology is prohibited for the following
proceedings [MCR 6.006(C)(3)]: (except in the discretion of the court)
Evidentiary hearings, bench trials or jury trials, or any proceeding wherein
the testimony of witnesses or presentation of evidence may occur, except in
the discretion of the court, after all parties have had notice and opportunity to
be heard on the use of videoconferencing technology. MCR 2.408(A)(2).
6. Probate
(a) Videoconferencing technology is allowed for the following proceedings:
Mental health proceedings if the subject of the petition waives the right to be
physically present under MCR 5.140(B)
Voluntary consent to guardianship of an Indian child under MCR 5.404(B)
Except as otherwise prescribed in MCR 5.410, upon request of any
participant or sua sponte, the court may allow the use of videoconferencing
technology in accordance with MCR 2.407. MCR 5.140(A)
(b) Videoconferencing technology is presumed for the following proceedings
[MCR 5.140(C)]:
Uncontested petitions or motions in guardianship, conservatorship, protected
individuals and decedent estates, subject to the person’s right to be
physically present.
(c) Videoconferencing technology is prohibited for the following proceedings:
Bench trials or jury trials, or any proceeding wherein the testimony of
witnesses or presentation of evidence may occur, except in the discretion of
the court, after all parties have had notice and opportunity to be heard on the
use of videoconferencing technology. [MCR 2.408(A)(2)]
34
Michigan Trial Court Standards for Courtroom Technology
Section 2: Standards for Videoconferencing Technology
Chapter 2: Equipment and Technology Standards
(2/15)
Chapter 2: Equipment and Technology Standards
A.
Components
The components of a videoconferencing system include a screen or monitor, coder-decoder
software, camera, MIC array, and remote control. Judicial Information Systems (JIS) has
outfitted most trial courts with Polycom
TM
for their videoconferencing needs. See Appendix
A of this chapter for visuals of the Polycom HDX videoconferencing equipment.
B.
Performance Features
1.
Open standards video technology must be capable of high-definition, full-motion video
(Skype does not meet this standard).
2.
Equipment must be capable of 30 fps (frames per second). Resolution quality is at the
discretion of the court, but a preferred video quality is 4CIF or better.
3.
Either over the air or direct in-line court recording may be used.
4.
Video and sound quality must be sufficient to allow participants to observe the demeanor
and nonverbal communications of other participants. Sound quality must be sufficient to
clearly hear what is taking place in the courtroom to the same extent as if the participant
was present in the courtroom.
5.
Courtroom camera(s) must have the ability to deliver various views of the courtroom so
that remote participants can observe persons and activities taking place in the courtroom
during the proceedings.
6.
Parties and counsel at remote locations must be able to mute the microphone system at
that location so that they may have private, confidential communication.
C.
Interface with Court Recording System
Videoconferencing equipment should be fed directly into the recording system, but if this
feature is not available, move a microphone to a position near the speaker through which the
videoconferencing dialogue will be emitted.
D.
Maintenance Renewal
Renewal of maintenance coverage is highly recommended to enable software updates,
maintain statewide compatibility, and facilitate timely repair of components.
35
Michigan Trial Court Standards for Courtroom Technology
Section 2: Standards for Videoconferencing Technology
Chapter 2: Equipment and Technology Standards
(2/15)
E.
Access to Records
1. Access to records defined in MCR 8.119(F) is governed by MCR 8.119(H)(2)(b) and
must be regulated by policy and procedures established through local administrative
order. Model LAO 8 must be used as the basis of this policy.
2. Pursuant to MCR 2.407 (B)(10), courts must provide access to a proceeding held using
videoconferencing technology to the public either during the proceeding or immediately
after via access to a video recording of the proceeding, unless the proceeding is closed, or
access would otherwise be limited by statute or rule.
36
Michigan Trial Court Standards for Courtroom Technology
Section 2: Standards for Videoconferencing Technology
Chapter 2 Appendix: Polycom HDX Series System Components
(2/15)
Appendix A: Polycom HDX Series System Components
Components of the Polycom HDX Series Codec bundle include:
Key buttons on the remote control include:
Codec
Camera
MIC
Array
Remote Control
Display
Camera
Direction
Volume
Content
Enter / Select
Home
Back
Mute
Place a Call
Hang Up a Call
Back Space
37
Michigan Trial Court Standards for Courtroom Technology
Section 2: Standards for Videoconferencing Technology
Chapter 3: Testing Procedures and Scheduling Remote Participants
(2/15)
Chapter 3: Testing Procedures and Scheduling Remote Participants
Because there is no single universal videoconferencing equipment throughout the state, operating
procedures vary. However, for courts that use the Polycom
TM
installed by Judicial Information
Systems, a How-to-Use Reference that can be kept with the equipment is available in Appendix
A of this chapter.
A.
System Testing
Video systems should be tested both in advance of court proceedings and whenever there is a
problem connecting, hearing or being heard, or seeing or being seen during a video call. Test
units are available for testing at all times and are configured to answer automatically.
1.
Basic Calling
To test the video system for basic calling connectivity, go to the Courts Directory
(Home Screen > Directory > Favorites). Near the top of the Courts Directory should be
two test units: Test 4000 HOJ and Test 8000JE. Place a call to either unit. If a
connection is made, the device has network connectivity.
2.
Calling Michigan Department of Corrections
To test the video system for connectivity to Michigan Department of Corrections
(MDOC) facilities go to the Courts Directory (Home Screen > Directory > Favorites).
Near the top of the Courts Directory should be an MDOC Test Bellamy Creek entry.
Place a test call to the unit. This test unit should be used only after successful testing
with the Test 4000 HOJ or Test 8000 JE video units. If a connection is made, the device
has been properly registered in the MDOC video firewall.
B.
Troubleshooting
1.
Identifying Errors Using the Call Status Indicator
The call status indicator appears as a small circle in the lower left part of the screen when
making a call. Quarter BLUE means the network path is being negotiated. Half
YELLOW means the far end has been reached but no one has answered the call. GREEN
means the call has successfully connected.
If the status indicator fails to move from quarter blue to half yellow, it could mean that
the remote video unit is turned off, the dialing string is incorrect, or there is an issue with
the network (local, Internet, or far site).
38
Michigan Trial Court Standards for Courtroom Technology
Section 2: Standards for Videoconferencing Technology
Chapter 3: Testing Procedures and Scheduling Remote Participants
(2/21)
2.
Dialing String Errors
A common cause of connection errors is an incorrect dialing string. This can happen
either with manual calls or using an inbound call from the Recent Calls log. Use the
Courts Directory to make calls to avoid this problem. IPs using 192.x.x.x, 10.x.x.x, or
172.x.x.x are private and cannot be reached via the Internet.
C.
Scheduling Remote Participants
1.
Michigan Department of Corrections
All video calls involving MDOC inmates should be scheduled through MDOC Central
WRIT. Scheduling can be done by the court or prosecutor (with the court’s authority).
MDOC facility video units are listed in the Courts Directory. MDOC support can be
obtained from:
Alanna Schnell
Records Administrator, Michigan Department of Corrections
517-780-6427 (office)
517-512-0712 (cell)
2.
Michigan State Police and Local Jails
Scheduling procedures for MSP forensic expert court appearances and inmate
appearances from the local jail are locally determined. The MSP forensic labs video
units are listed in the Courts Directory.
D.
Videoconferencing Support Contacts
For courts that use the Polycom
TM
installed by Judicial Information Systems, support is
available, including operations training, video testing, network troubleshooting, maintenance
renewal, and other video-related support.
Jim Ewing, Judicial Information Systems, Video Specialist
313-515-3334
39
Michigan Trial Court Standards for Courtroom Technology
Section 2: Standards for Videoconferencing Technology
Chapter 3 Appendix: Polycom HDX Series System Operations
(2/15)
2
1
3
Appendix A: Polycom HDX Series System Operations
The Michigan Supreme Court maintains a directory of more than 700 video systems including
local courts, local jails, MDOC prisons, MSP forensic labs, state of Michigan community health
facilities, and county youth homes. The directory is loaded into each court’s video system at
time of install. Updated directories are e-mailed out periodically for the local court and IT staff
to import the new directory into its video system.
Placing a Call Using Courts Directory
1.
Go to the home screen.
2a. Select the Directory icon using the arrow keys and Select button.
2b. Select Favorites from the directory options list.
2c. Highlight the desired video system entry.
3. Press the Call button.
Notes:
Test units are listed at the top of the directory.
Other video systems are placed within the folders.
Test units and jails are generally set to auto answer.
Courts are generally set to manual answer, requiring someone on
the far end to accept the call.
Hanging Up a Call
1. Press the Hang Up button.
Notes:
Calls that are not hung up remain active even if the monitor is
turned off.
Most units were set at time of install to automatically disconnect
the call after six hours.
1.
40
Michigan Trial Court Standards for Courtroom Technology
Section 2: Standards for Videoconferencing Technology
Chapter 3 Appendix: Polycom HDX Series System Operations
(2/15)
Placing a Call Manually
Sometimes a court needs to call a video system not listed in the directory.
To do so the court needs to have the dialing string of the remote video system.
1.
Go to the home screen.
2.
Select the Place a Call icon using the arrow keys and Select
button.
3.
Clear the dialing string field with the backspace if needed.
4.
Enter the dialing string using the numbers keypad.
4. Press the Call button.
Notes:
Dialing strings can take the following formats:
o
IP Address Only (e.g., 75.41.109.236)
o
Two-Part Dialing Strings (IP and Extension)
Two-part dialing strings can be called using either of two formats:
o
Extension@IP Address (e.g., 135@12.232.9.10)
o
IP Address##Extension (e.g., 12.232.9.10##135)
The keypad button above the number 1 brings up a soft keypad for
inputting the @ sign.
The # symbol is below the number 9 key.
2
3
1
4
41
Michigan Trial Court Standards for Courtroom Technology
Section 2: Standards for Videoconferencing Technology
Chapter 3 Appendix: Polycom HDX Series System Operations
(2/15)
1
2.
Controlling Audio/Sound
Control the sound you are hearing from the call:
1.
Press the volume control using the + and – ends of the Volume
button.
Mute your MIC so you cannot be heard by the far end:
2.
Press the Mute button.
Notes:
The video system MIC is highly sensitive so be sure to mute if you
don’t want the far end to hear a sidebar conversation.
The lights on the MIC array will be green if your MIC is muted.
The lights on the MIC are red if your MIC is muted.
The MIC symbol on the screen shows if near and/or far MICs are muted.
Controlling the Camera
The camera has PTZ (pan, tilt, zoom) capability, allowing different views
of the court room.
1.
Manual Camera Control
Pan (left and right) and tilt (up and down) are controlled by
the arrow buttons.
Zoom is controlled by the Zoom button.
2.
Camera Presets
Manual control can be time consuming, so presets are
the recommended approach to change camera views.
To store a preset, move the camera manually to the desired
view and then press and hold a numeric key #X until the
monitor displays Preset #X Stored.
To move between camera presets just press and release the
numeric key and the camera will move to the saved view.
Notes:
Typical presets set at time of install are: Judge’s Bench 0, Wide Angle 1, Attorneys 2.
The Far and Near buttons above and below the arrows set whether you are controlling
your camera or the far end camera (if that is enabled).
1
2.
42
Michigan Trial Court Standards for Courtroom Technology
Section 2: Standards for Videoconferencing Technology
Chapter 3 Appendix: Polycom HDX Series System Operations
(2/15)
Changing Monitor Display Layouts
There are several display layouts that can be used during a point-to-point
video call. The recommended display layout is Far End Large and Near
End Small.
Near End Camera Only Full Screen
Far End Camera Only Full Screen
Far and Near End – 50 /50 split
Far End Camera Large and Near End Small
Near End Large Camera and Far End Small
To change display layout press and release the Display button to scroll
through the various options.
Display PC or Tablet Content
The screen of a PC or tablet can be shown on the monitor.
Windows PCs, iPads, or Android devices can be used.
When connected, whatever is on the PC or tablet’s display will
appear on the monitor.
In a video call, the far end monitor will also show the content.
To display content, connect the 25’ People + Content cable
provided at time of install to the PC or tablet. (The cable is
commonly found coiled behind the TV.)
The cable interface connectors for the PC or tablet are VGA
(video) and 3.5mm (headset audio).
For a Polycom HDX 6000, content is immediately displayed
after the cable is connected to the PC or tablet.
For a Polycom HDX 7000, the content source type must be
selected. Connect the cable to the PC or tablet and press the
Content button. Next use the arrow button to highlight the Laptop
icon and press the Select button.
43
Michigan Trial Court Standards for Courtroom Technology
Section 2: Standards for Videoconferencing Technology
Chapter 4: Videoconferencing Participation by Attorneys and Witnesses
(2/15)
Chapter 4: Videoconferencing Participation by Attorneys and Witnesses
A.
Available Options
There are a few options available to attorneys, witnesses, and others who want to participate
in a court proceeding through videoconferencing. The following describes these options and
some factors to consider in choosing an appropriate method.
1.
Remote participants can use the H.323 standard for audio-visual communication sessions
that are used in courtrooms. In general, most Polycom
TM
or Tandberg videoconferencing
systems will be able to call courtroom video systems if they are configured for IP
videoconferencing and can make calls over the Internet. Attorneys and expert witnesses
who will commonly be interacting with the court via video may want to consider their
own dedicated video system.
2.
Polycom
TM
offers applications for Windows PCs, iPads, iPhones, and Android devices.
The Apple and Android apps are free and can be found by searching for “Polycom
Realpresence” in iTunes or the Marketplace. Polycom
TM
Realpresence desktop software
for Windows PCs is available as a 30-day free trial at
http://www.polycom.com/content/www/en/forms/realpresence-desktop-trial.html.
Use of Skype is not authorized for videoconferencing participation with the courts.
B.
Video Call Considerations
1.
Internet Speed
Most home Internet services will work fine for video calls. However, to improve quality
and to avoid potential additional charges on monthly mobile device bills, a remote
participant should be on a WiFi link rather than a mobile device data plan.
2.
Video Lighting, Sound, and Etiquette
To produce a quality video call, use a room with even lighting. If possible, avoid bright
windows on one side, back lighting, and florescent lighting. Use diffused lighting if
possible.
To produce a quality video call, make the call from a quiet place. Test the microphone
and speaker controls before making the call. Place the mobile device so the camera is
eye-level and steady. Do not hold a tablet by hand or place it on a desk looking up at the
face.
44
Michigan Trial Court Standards for Courtroom Technology
Section 2: Standards for Videoconferencing Technology
Chapter 4: Videoconferencing Participation by Attorneys and Witnesses
(2/15)
C.
Testing Connectivity
After configuring a system or installing an appropriate video application, the remote
participant should make a test call to the court test unit at 75.41.109.236. The test unit is
available at all times and answers automatically. A successful call will confirm that a unit
has been set up properly.
A second test call should be scheduled and made with the court before the proceeding. This
call should be from the remote user to the courtroom because firewall restrictions will likely
prevent the court from making the call. The dialing string convention is the “IP
address##extension” format and can be provided by the local court.