International
Tax News
Edition 107 March 2022
Start
www.pwc.com/its
Welcome
Keeping up with the constant flow of international tax developments
worldwide can be a real challenge for multinational companies.
International Tax News is a monthly publication that offers updates and
analysis on developments taking place around the world, authored by
specialists in PwC’s global international tax network.
We hope that you will find this publication helpful, and look forward to
your comments.
In this issue Legislation Administrative Treaties
Glossary
OECD/EU
Bernard Moens
Global Leader International Tax Services Network
+1 703 362 7644
COVID-19 can cause potentially significant people, social and economic implications for
organisations. This link provides information on how you can prepare your organisation and respond.
Responding to the potential business impacts of COVID-19
In this issue
Administrative
Singapore
Singapore explores a new minimum
effective tax rate regime
Spain
Spain addresses teleworking and the
creation of a permanent establishment
Spain
Spain issues new partipcation
exemption regime ruling
Spain
Spain publishes guidance on the
annual tax and customs control plan for
2022
Legislation
Canada
Canada proposes mandatory
disclosure legislation
Spain
Spain approves corporate income tax
and non-resident income tax
modifications
Hong Kong
Tax measures proposed in the 2022-23
Hong Kong Budget
OECD/EU
European Union
EU Finance Ministers do not reach
unanimous support for proposed Pillar
Two Directive
OECD
OECD releases Pillar Two
Commentary and launches public
consultation on the Implementation
Framework
Hong Kong
The OECD concludes that Hong
Kong’s carried interest tax concession
regime is 'not harmful'
Treaties
France
France updates tax treaties with
Argentina, Colombia, and Denmark
In this issue Legislation Administrative Treaties Glossary OECD/EU
Legislation
Canada
Canada proposes mandatory
disclosure legislation
On February 4, 2022, the Department of
Finance released draft legislative proposals
to enhance Canada’s mandatory disclosure
rules for reportable transactions, notifiable
transactions, and uncertain tax treatments.
These rules are proposed to apply to taxation
years that begin, and transactions entered
into, after 2021. The penalty provisions,
however, would not apply to transactions that
occur before royal assent of the enacting
legislation.
Reportable transactions:
Current rules in the Income Tax Act (ITA)
require reporting a transaction if it is
considered an 'avoidance transaction' as that
term is defined for purposes of the general
anti-avoidance rule, and it meets at least two
of three defined hallmarks (contingent fee
arrangement, confidentiality protection, or
contractual protection).
The proposals would:
require the presence of only one of the
three hallmarks for a transaction to be
reportable
amend the 'contractual protection'
hallmark to exclude protection offered in
the context of normal commercial
transactions to a wide market (e.g.
standard commercial tax risk insurance),
so that these protections would not
trigger a reporting requirement
amend the definition of 'avoidance
transaction' for these purposes, so that a
transaction can be considered an
avoidance transaction if it can
reasonably be concluded that one of the
main purposes of entering into the
transaction is to obtain a tax benefit.
A taxpayer would be required to report
detailed information regarding the transaction
to the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) within
45 days of the earlier of the day that the
taxpayer (or another person who entered into
the transaction for the benefit of the taxpayer)
becomes contractually obligated to enter into
the transaction or enters into the transaction.
Notifiable transactions:
The proposals introduce a requirement to
report pertinent information on a new
category of specific transactions (known as
'notifiable transactions') to the CRA on a
timely basis. The Minister of National
Revenue, with the concurrence of the
Minister of Finance, would have the authority
to designate a transaction or series of
transactions. A notifiable transaction is a
transaction or series of transactions that is
the same as, or substantially similar to, a
designated transaction or series of
transactions. Transactions will be considered
substantially similar if they are expected to
obtain the same or similar types of tax
consequences and are either factually similar
or based on the same or similar tax strategy.
Notifiable transactions would include both
transactions that the CRA has found to be
abusive and transactions identified as
transactions of interest. The description of a
notifiable transaction is expected to set out
the fact patterns or outcomes in sufficient
detail to enable taxpayers to comply with the
disclosure rule.
Uncertain tax treatments:
Currently, there is no requirement to disclose
uncertain tax treatments. The proposals
would require a corporate taxpayer meeting
the following conditions to report particular
uncertain tax treatments to the CRA:
the corporation is required to file a
Canadian income tax return, and has at
least $50 million in assets at the end of
the taxation year
the corporation, or a group of which the
corporation is a member, has audited
financial statements prepared in
accordance with International Financial
Reporting Standards or other country-
specific generally accepted accounting
principles relevant for corporations that
are listed on a stock exchange outside
Canada
there is an uncertain tax treatment
related to the corporation’s Canadian
income tax reflected in the audited
financial statements.
A corporation would be required to report
information on uncertain tax treatments at the
same time that the reporting corporation’s
Canadian income tax return is due.
See our PwC Tax Insight for more information
on the proposals.
These proposals significantly
expand the types of transactions
that could be reportable to the CRA.
It will place a heavy burden on
taxpayers and promoters or advisers
to comply with these new disclosure
obligations if they are involved in
transactions designated as
'notifiable transactions' or
considered to have an uncertain tax
treatment. Although it is intended
that reporting will be required for
transactions entered into after 2021
that are the same as, or
substantially similar to, transactions
that are subsequently designated as
notifiable transactions, the deadline
for reporting such transactions is
unclear. Late-filing penalties will not
apply to transactions in 2022 that
are undertaken before the date of
royal assent of the enacting
legislation for these rules, but the
commencement of the
reassessment period for such
transactions could still be deferred
until reporting occurs.
In this issue Legislation Administrative Treaties Glossary OECD/EU
Kara Selby
Canada
+1 416-869-2372
Michael Black
Canada
+1 416-814-5876
Legislation
Spain
Spain approves corporate income tax and
non-resident income tax modifications
Law 5/2022, of 9 March, which amends Law 27/
2014, of 27 November, on corporate income tax and
the revised text of the non-resident income tax law in
relation to hybrid mismatches, was published in the
Spanish Official State Gazette (BOE) om March 10.
The only change with respect to the previous
wording consists of a technical improvement in the
article of the CIT in relation to hybrid mismatches.
This new Law incorporates the necessary
amendments to the regulation of the declaration of
assets and rights abroad (Form 720) to bring it into
line with European law, following the ruling of the
Court of Justice of the European Union (Case C-788/
19), which agreed that certain aspects of the legal
regime associated with the obligation to declare
assets and rights abroad was contrary to EU Law.
Multinational enterprises with either
operations in Spain or with Spanish holding
companies should review how these
changes may affect their investments in
Spain.
In this issue Legislation Administrative Treaties Gl
ossary
OECD/EU
Roberta Poza Cid
Spain
+34 669 41 92 20
Javier Pastor Carranza
Spain
+34 628 61 72 89
Legislation
Hong Kong
Tax measures proposed in the 2022-23
Hong Kong Budget
In the 2022-23 Hong Kong Budget delivered
February 23, the Financial Secretary proposed,
among others, the following profits tax measures:
A one-off reduction of 100% of profits tax for the
year of assessment 2021/22, subject to a ceiling
of HK$10,000 per case. The Revenue (Tax
Concessions) Bill 2022, which seeks to
implement this measure, was gazetted on
March 4. The Bill was introduced into the
Legislative Council on March 16.
Tax concessions for eligible family investment
management entities managed by single-family
offices.
An 8.25% tax concession to attract more
maritime enterprises to establish a presence in
Hong Kong.
Following the OECD’s work on BEPS 2.0, to
continuing discussions with impacted large
multinational groups on Hong Kong's
implementation of BEPS 2.0 in order to ensure
that Hong Kong's tax regime aligns with
international consensus, while retaining the
renowned simplicity, certainty and transparency
of the territorial tax regime.
See our PwC Insight for more information.
In this issue Legislation Administrative Treaties Gossary OECD/EU
This Hong Kong Budget
contains measures
covering enterprises in a
wide range of industries,
with immediate measures
to address the challenges
brought about by the
current pandemic, as well
as longer term measures
to pave the path for
recovery. In response to
the BEPS 2.0
development, the
government plans to
inititate legislation in the
second half of 2022 for a
global minimum effective
tax rate of 15% for large
MNEs by 2023. It also is
considering introducing a
domestic minimum Top-up
Tax for these MNEs
effective in 2024/25, while
maintaining a simple tax
system including the
territorial source principle
in order to minimise the
impact on SMEs. MNEs
should follow how these
developments may impact
their operations.
Gwenda Ho
Hong Kong
+852 2289 3857
Administrative
Singapore
Singapore explores a new minimum
effective tax rate regime
The Finance Minister announced that Singapore will
study the feasibility of introducing a 15% minimum
effective tax rate (METR) regime. This is in response
to the Global Anti-Base Erosion Model Rules (the
GloBE rules) released by the OECD/G20 Inclusive
Framework to address the tax challenges arising
from the digitalisation of the economy (Pillar Two).
For jurisdictions such as Singapore that have
historically used tax incentives as part of a suite of
measures to attract foreign direct investment (FDI),
the proposed Top-up Tax under the GloBE rules
presents a significant challenge to fiscal policy, since
the value of tax incentives to multinational enterprise
groups is diluted if a Top-up Tax is applied outside
Singapore. The Singapore policy response is
therefore twofold:
to evaluate the role and structure of FDI
incentives going forward, in order to ensure that
Singapore remains competitive
to evaluate whether and how to adjust the tax
base so that any Top-up Tax is levied by
Singapore and not foreign countries.
The METR, which would apply to multinational
enterprise groups with annual revenues of at least
€750 million, has therefore been tabled for
consideration and will undergo industry consultation.
See our Budget 2022 Commentary for more
inforation.
In this issue Legislation Administrative Treaties Glossary OECD/EU
Details have not been
released, but if enacted,
the METR is expected to
closely align with the
GloBE rules, which are
computationally complex
and will require a
significant reworking of an
MNE’s tax compliance and
tax accounting templates.
If the METR is
implemented, multinational
enterprises can expect
enhancement of other
non-tax measures so that
Singapore remains
competitive as a business
location.
Paul Lao
Singapore
+65 8869 8718
Chris Woo
Singapore
+65 9118 0811
Administrative
Spain
Spain addresses teleworking and
the creation of a permanent
establishment
The Spanish Directorate General for Taxation
(Spanish DGT) recently issued a binding
ruling on international teleworking and the
potential creation of a permanent
establishment (PE) in Spain. In the binding
ruling (V0066-22), dated 18 January, the
Spanish DGT ruled on the existence or not of
a PE of British company due to the fact than
an employee carried out its work in Spanish
territory during the COVID-19 lockdown and
decided to remain in Spain for personal
reasons once the COVID-19 measures
adopted in Spain were finalized.
The Spanish DGT noted for there to be a
fixed place of business in the event that the
activity is carried out from the employee's
private home, two circumstances must be
met: i) continuity over time and ii) that the
place of business is at the disposal of the
non-resident company.
The Spainish DGT ruled that the continuity
requirement was met since the employee
remained in Spain after the lifting of the
restrictive measures that were adopted
because of the COVID-19 pandemic. The
Spanish DGT cited several criteria that would
lead to the conclusion that the place of
business is not at the disposal of the
company: i) that the permanence was at the
employee's personal choice and not ordered
by the company; ii) that the employee has a
place of work at the company's offices in the
United Kingdom at his or her disposal; and iii)
that the company does not bear any costs or
pay any special remuneration to the
employee for teleworking.
The Spanish DGT held that a PE was not
creared during the COVID-19 lockdown
period, and for the post lockdown period,
under these specific facts, the employyee's
home office was not at the disposal of the UK
entity and therefore did not create a PE. The
Spanish DGT noted that specific facts and
circumstances should be reviewed and
considered on a case-by-case basis, and it
avoided making a general statememt for
similar situations.
This binding ruling is relevant for
multinationals with employees
working from home due to the
pandemic and that are still in Spain,
taking into account that the
residence of the employees in Spain
also could trigger tax obligations for
the employers.
In this issue Legislation Administrative Treaties Gl
ossary
OECD/EU
Roberta Poza Cid
Spain
+34 669 41 92 20
Javier Pastor Carranza
Spain
+34 628 61 72 89
Administrative
Spain
Spain issues new partipcation
exemption regime ruling
The Spanish Directorate General for Taxation
(Spanish DGT) recently issued a binding
rulling on the application of the exemption
regime envisaged in Article 21 of the
corporate income tax act.
Current article 21 of the corporate income tax
act exempts dividends received by Spanish
entities at 95% for fiscal years commencing
on or after 1 January 2021 (previously
exempted at 100%), if certain requirements
are met.
Through this recent binding ruling, the
Spanish DGT ruled on the relation between
this new 95% exemption regime and the
Spanish ETVE regime (Spanish Holding
Regime). The ETVE regime provides that
dividends distributed by, or capital gains
from, an ETVE (which stem from participation
exemption-qualifying income) obtained by
nonresidents are not considered to be
obtained in Spanish territory (i.e., non
taxable), provided that certain requirements
are met.
The Spanish DGT concluded that profits
distributed to non-resident shareholders by
Spanish entities subject to the ETVE Regime
derived from income (dividends / gains)
qualifying for the 95% participation exemption
will not be deemed to have been obtained in
Spanish territory, and the taxes paid (5% on
the participation exemption-qualifying
income) under the new 95% exemption
regime will not be an obstacle to the
application of this regime.
This binding ruling is relevant for
those multinational groups with
Spanish holding entities that are
subject to the Spanish ETVE
Regime and that plan to distribute
dividends to their non-resident
shareholders.
In this issue Legislation Administrative Treaties Glossary OECD/EU
Roberta Poza Cid
Spain
+34 669 419 220
Javier Pastor Carranza
Spain
+34 628 617 289
Administrative
Spain
Spain publishes guidance on the
annual tax and customs control plan
for 2022
On 4 March 2022, the Spanish Tax Agency
published the general guidelines of the
Annual Tax and Customs Control Plan for
2022 by means of the Resolution dated 26
January 2022.
The Annual Plan defines the main strategy of
the Spanish Tax Agency for fighting tax fraud,
by means of identifying taxpayers, industries,
transactions, and activities considered a
priority for the prevention and control of tax
and customs fraud, which are framed within
the 2020-2023 Strategic Plan.
The Spanish tax authorities’ audit and
verification activities mainly will focus on:
verification of the recurring transfer
pricing documentation and reporting
obligations
identification of areas of preferential
attention: related-party transactions
classified as high tax risk, erosion of tax
bases caused by the establishment of
offshore structures, erosion of taxable
bases caused by the establishment of
structures abroad in which profits are
retained that should be taxed in Spain
avoiding the concealment of business or
professional activities and the abusive
use of company taxation by individuals.
The role of the International Tax Office is
highlighted in order for it to carry out audits.
This office will collaborate directly in the
verification of large companies by issuing
criteria to homogenize the treatment of similar
situations and guarantee standards of quality
and legal certainty in these situations.
Taxpayers should anticipate
possible tax verifications and
therefore should analyze whether
they are in any of the risk groups. In
addition, they should review their
transfer pricing policy.
In this issue Legislation Administrative Treaties Gl
ossary
OECD/EU
Roberta Poza Cida
Spain
+34 669 419 220
Javier Pastor Carranza
Spain
+34 628 617 289
OECD/EU
European Union
EU Finance Ministers do not reach
unanimous support for proposed Pillar
Two Directive
The EU Finance Ministers met to debate and
ultimately vote on a compromise text covering the
introduction of a minimum taxation by the EU
Member States. While there was broad support for
the compromise text, available here , it was not
supported unanimously. The date on which Member
States would transpose the Directive and make it
effective had been changed from 1 January 2023 to
31 December 2023 in the compromise text. The
UTPR is pushed out to 31 December 2024 under
this compromise text. Poland still has reservations.
Unanimous agreement is required under the special
legislative procedure.
To read more, see the full Tax Policy Bulletin.
In this issue Legislation Administrative Treaties Glossary OECD/EU
The lack of unanimous
agreement on the
compromise text is not
surprising on the whole
but it raises the question
as to how the French
Presidency expects to
resolve the fundamental
issues raised, most
particularly those raised by
Poland.
Postponing the
implementation of the new
rules to 31 December
2023 would enhance the
possibility of proper
implementation of these
very complicated rules,
both by taxpayers and tax
administrations (and note
that there is a technical
issue to be clarified on the
application of these rules
on the last day of many
business’ tax years). It
would also mitigate the
risk of divergence between
the OECD Model Rules
and the EU rules,
particularly with respect to
safe harbours on which
the OECD will probably
not publish guidance
before the end of this year.
Will H Morris
United States of America (the)
+1 202-213-2372
Stef van Weeghel
Netherlands (the)
+31 6 51612838
OECD/EU
OECD
OECD releases Pillar Two
Commentary and launches public
consultation on the Implementation
Framework
The OECD released Commentary and
illustrative Examples to the Pillar Two Model
Rules (Model Rules) on 14 March 2022. The
Commentary provides guidance on the
interpretation and application of the Model
Rules and is intended to promote a
consistent interpretation of the Model Rules,
which will help facilitate coordinated
outcomes for both tax administrations and
MNE Groups.
The Commentary has been eagerly
anticipated given the number of questions
that remain open since publication of the
Model Rules. In addressing the following
open issues, the Commentary:
Reinforces the position that there need
not be a connection and/or transaction
(e.g., a deductible payment) between the
collecting Constituent Entity/jurisdiction
with the UTPR Top-up Tax Amount and
the Low-taxed Constituent Entity/
jurisdiction with the Top-up Tax Amount.
Makes no change to the provisions on
booking down tax attributes to the
minimum tax rate (Article 4.4.1), and the
possibility of a Top-up Tax in a year
when there is no income (Article 4.1.5).
Provides a specific example of a “tax
credit equivalent to a portion of the tax
paid under the IIR to be used against
other taxes” as being a condition that
would prevent a regime from being
regarded as a qualified IIR.
Notes that the Implementation
Framework “will include implementing a
process to assist tax administrations in
determining whether a country has
introduced a qualified IIR.” The
outcomes of these subsequent
determinations are intended to be
released and made available to the
public.
Expands on the definition of ‘Qualified
Refundable Tax Credit,’ and clearly
articulates the disparate treatment of
qualified versus non-qualified tax credits.
The use of non-qualified tax incentives
or tax credits reduce covered taxes and
may end up reducing the ETR of the
UPE in its home country below 15%,
triggering application of the UTPR.
Read the full Tax Policy Bulletin here.
In this issue Legislation Administrative Treaties Glossary OECD/EU
The Commentary attempts
to explain the Pillar Two
Model Rules in a more
accessible way. It helps
address some of the
outstanding issues but,
from a technical point of
view, it does not go as far
as we would have hoped
to clarify a number of
outstanding issues.
The public consultation on
the Implementation
Framework does not look
for further comment on the
policy choices made in the
Model Rules or the
Commentary. Rather the
focus is on putting in place
mechanisms that will
ensure tax administrations
and MNEs can implement
and apply the Model Rules
in a consistent and
coordinated manner while
minimising compliance
costs. Our view is that
questions of sufficient
importance raised by the
Model Rules and
Commentary can still be
raised by reference to the
Implementation
Framework.
Edwin Visser
Netherlands (the)
+31 6 51612838
Stef van Weeghel
Netherlands (the)
+31 6 51612838
OECD/EU
Hong Kong
The OECD concludes that Hong Kong’s
carried interest tax concession regime is
'not harmful'
On 24 January 2022, the OECD released the latest
peer review results under BEPS Action 5 - Harmful
Tax Practices, which set out the new conclusions
made by the Forum on Harmful Tax Practices
(FHTP) on nine preferential tax regimes. In
particular, the FHTP concluded that Hong Kong’s
profits tax concession regime for carried interest was
designed in compliance with the FHTP standards
and is therefore 'not harmful.'
See the OECD Peer Review Results on Prefential
Regimes.
The OECD’s conclusion is good news for
taxpayers currently enjoying the carried
interest tax concession regime in Hong
Kong. This regime offers a 0% profits tax
rate on eligible carried interest and 100%
exclusion of eligible carried interest from
income subject to salaries tax. It is key to
the development of the Hong Kong asset
and wealth management industry.
In this issue Legislation Administrative Treaties Glossary OECD/EU
Gwenda Ho
Hong Kong
+852 2289 3857
Treaties
France
France updates tax treaties with
Argentina, Colombia, and Denmark
The French network of tax treaties has
recently been updated:
The first tax treaty with Colombia
entered into force on 1 January 2022,
seven years after its signature by
France. The treaty will apply effective 1
January 2023. It essentially follows the
2014 OECD Model.
The new protocol of tax treaty with
Argentina was ratified by France on 31
January 2022. Application of this
protocol still depends on ratification by
Argentina which is pending. It provides
for a reduction of withholding tax rates; a
wide definition of dividends; a
'permanent establishment services'
clause and a most-favored-nation
clause.
A new tax treaty with Denmark was
signed in February 2022, thirteen years
after the termination of the last tax treaty.
It must now be submitted for
parliamentary approval and then ratified
by both states before entering into force.
It is essentially consistent with the 2017
OECD Model and it includes key
provisions of the MLI:
The MLI general anti-abuse rule: the
'principal purpose test'
Regarding PEs, a new 'dependent
agent' definition to cover situations
in which an agent habitually plays
the principal role leading to the
conclusion of contracts that are then
routinely concluded without material
modification by the enterprise. It
also includes provisions addressing
the artificial avoidance of PE status
through 'commissionaire
arrangements' and
Specific provisions regarding
transparent entities and dual
residency
The maximum rates of withholding
tax provided by the treaty are 15%
on dividends, reduced to 0% under
certain conditions (beneficial
ownership etc.), and 0% on interest
and royalties.
Taxpayers engaged in cross-border
operations between France and
Colombia, Argentina and Denmark,
must take into account the new
provisions of these tax treaties and
protocols and monitor entry into
force.
In this issue Legislation Administrative Treaties Glossary OECD/EU
Guillame Glon
France
33 1 56 57 40 72
Julie Copin
France
33 1 56 57 44 17
............................................................
............................................................
............................................................
............................................................
............................................................
............................................................
............................................................
............................................................
............................................................
............................................................
............................................................
............................................................
............................................................
............................................................
............................................................
............................................................
............................................................
............................................................
............................................................
............................................................
............................................................
Glossary
Definition
Argentine Tax Authorities
anti-tax avoidance directive
Australian Tax Office
Base Erosion and Profit Shifting
controlled foreign corporation
corporate income tax
Cyprus Tax Authority
EU Council Directive 2018/822/EU on cross-border tax arrangements
digital services tax
double tax treaty
effective tax rate
European Union
Multinational enterprise
notionial interest deduction
permanent establishment
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Research & Development
same business test
similar business test
value added tax
withholding tax
In this issue Legislation Administrative Treaties
Glossary
OECD/EU
Acronym
AFIP
ATAD
ATO
BEPS
CFC
CIT
CTA
DAC6
DST
DTT
ETR
EU
MNE
NID
PE
OECD
R&D
SBT
SiBT
VAT
WHT
Contact us
For your global contact and more information on PwC’s international tax services, please contact:
Bernard Moens
Global Leader International Tax Services Network
+1 703 362 7644
Geoff Jacobi
International Tax Services
+1 202 262 7652
Worldwide Tax Summaries
If you’re operating globally, are you
aware of changes to the myriad tax
rates in all the jurisdictions where you
operate?
If not, we can help - download the
eBook of our comprehensive tax
guide, or explore rates in over 150
countries using our online tools,
updated daily.
In this issue Legislation Administrative Treaties Glossary OECD/EU
At PwC, our purpose is to build trust in society and solve
important problems. We’re a network of firms in 157 countries
with over 276,000 people who are committed to delivering
quality in assurance, advisory and tax services. Find out more
and tell us what matters to you by visiting us at www.pwc.com.
This content is for general information purposes only, and
should not be used as a substitute for consultation with
professional advisors.
© 2022 PwC. All rights reserved. PwC refers to the PwC
network and/or one or more of its member firms, each of which
is a separate legal entity. Please see www.pwc.com/structure
for further details.
www.pwc.com/its