REPORTS STATE COURT OF CLAIMS W.Va.]50
2
Although the normal designation would be CO-01, Kenhill as the general contractor had all
of its change orders designated by letters GT meaning general trades contractor.
3
Whether the drain noted on the plans by the architect exists has never been
determined.
4
Respondent’s engineering firm for this project was Triad Engineering, Inc.
curtain drain. This work was defined in a change order entered into by the parties and
designated as GT-01.
2
Kenhill proceeded to excavate below the planned excavation
grade to place the French drain. The French drain extended from the area southeast of
E pod (the in-take area) through the area of D pod to the northwest corner of A pod (the
out-flow area). The trench was approximately seven to eight feet in depth and six feet
in width with a rubber membrane placed in the bottom and on the sides, large rocks
layered on the bottom, then a layer of gravel, and finally covered with a layer of filter
fabric. This structure allowed for drainage from the interstate through the construction
site to a marsh located adjacent to the site on the west side. The French drain and the
curtain drains were deemed by the parties to be necessary to protect the engineered fill
from subsurface water and, in turn, to protect the integrity of the slabs on grade which
would form the pad for the jail facility. Kenhill and respondent agreed upon the terms
of payment for the direct costs of this extra work and Kenhill was paid accordingly.
These directs costs are not in issue in this claim.
However, the construction of this French drain altered the sequence planned
for the construction of the various pods for the jail facility. These pods were designated
as A pod, B pod, C pod, D pod, and E pod. A pod, B pod, and C pod were the areas
of the jail for housing prisoners while D pod and E pod were visitor and administration
areas. A pod was a maximum security area and had different security requirements than
B pod and C pod. Originally, Kenhill planned to construct the pods beginning with E
pod, then C, D, B, and A pods, but it started excavating at E and D pods in it efforts to
find the French drain, then went to B and C pods when it was determined that either the
French drain was not there or that Kenhill just could not find it.
3
In any event, the
unplanned construction of the French drain by Kenhill began on or about September 18,
1992, the final decision having been made by respondent and its architect as to the
remedial measures to be taken for the extensive water problems at the site. The French
drain ran east to west through the project with a curtain drain around the south end of
B pod. This work was completed on November 13, 1992.
During the months of September through December, Kenhill was excavating
at various areas and placing the engineered fill in lifts as required by the terms of the
contract. Footers for the building were also being laid. On January 12, 1993, Kenhill
was directed by respondent to halt all work in the area of B pod while a decision was
made as to the course of action to be taken at this site due to continuing subsurface water
problems. Kenhill installed a second curtain drain around the south end of B pod when
it became apparent to respondent that the subsurface water problems were continuing
to hamper construction in this area. This work was later confirmed and paid for by GT-
02. The second curtain drain alleviated the water problem, but another problem was
encountered which concerned respondent. The integrity of the engineered fill at B pod
was believed to have been affected by subsurface water problems. At a meeting of the
parties in Charleston on April 21,1993, a decision was made to attempt a pressure
grouting procedure to stabilize the soil beneath B pod. This course of action was
thought to be a way to avoid removing all of the engineered fill which had already been
placed. Respondent, through its architect and engineer
4
, directed that EB Consultants,
Inc., should be used for the work, but after several weeks of unsuccessful efforts to
engage this company as the subcontractor, Kenhill entered into a subcontract with
Intrusion Pre-Pakt. This took several additional weeks. Thus the work on B pod was