2018 AP Research Academic Paper Rubric v1.0
Score of 1
Report on Existing Knowledge
Score of 2
Report on Existing Knowledge with
Simplistic Use of a Research Method
Score of 3
Ineffectual Argument for a
New Understanding
Score of 4
Well-Supported, Articulate Argument
Conveying a New Understanding
Score of 5
Rich Analysis of a New Understanding
Addressing a Gap in the Research Base
•
Presents an overly broad topic
of in
quiry.
•
Presents a topic of inquiry with
narrowing scope or
focus, that is
NOT carried through either in the
method or in the overall line of
reasoning.
•
Carries the focus or scope of a
topic of
inquiry through the
method AND overall line of
reasoning, even though the focus
or scope might still be narrowing.
•
Focuses a topic of inquiry with
clear a
nd narrow parameters,
which are addressed through the
method and the conclusion.
•
Focuses a topic of inquiry with
clear a
nd narrow parameters,
which are addressed through the
method and the conclusion.
•
Situates a topic of inquiry
within a single perspective
derived from scholarly works
OR through a variety of
perspectives derived from
mostly non-scholarly works.
•
Situates a topic of inquiry within a
single
perspective derived from
scholarly works OR through a
variety of perspectives derived from
mostly non-scholarly works.
•
Situates a topic of inquiry within
relevant
scholarly works of
varying perspectives, although
connections to some works may
be unclear.
• Explicitly connects a topic of
inquiry to relevant scholarly works
of varying perspectives AND
logically explains how the topic of
inquiry addresses a gap.
•
Explicitly connects a topic of
inquiry to relevant scholarly works
of varying perspectives AND
logically explains how the topic of
inquiry addresses a gap.
•
Describes a search and report
process.
•
Describes a nonreplicable research
method OR
provides an
oversimplified description of a
method, with questionable
alignment to the purpose of the
inquiry.
•
Describes a reasonably replicable
research method
, with
questionable alignment to the
purpose of the inquiry.
•
Logically defends the alignment of
a d
etailed, replicable research
method to the purpose of the
inquiry.
•
Logically defends the alignment of
a d
etailed, replicable research
method to the purpose of the
inquiry.
•
Summarizes or reports existing
kn
owledge in the field of
understanding pertaining to
the topic of inquiry.
•
Summarizes or reports existing
knowledge in t
he field of
understanding pertaining to the
topic of inquiry.
•
Conveys a new understanding or
concl
usion, with an
underdeveloped line of
reasoning OR insufficient
evidence.
•
Supports a new understanding or
conclusion through a logically
organized line of reasoning AND
sufficient evidence. The
limitations and/or implications, if
present, of the new
understanding or conclusion are
oversimplified.
• Justifies a new understanding or
concl
usion through a logical
progression of inquiry choices,
sufficient evidence, explanation of
the limitations of the conclusion,
and an explanation of the
implications to the community of
practice.
•
Generally communicates the
student’s ideas, although
errors in grammar, discipline-
specific style, and organization
distract or confuse the reader.
•
Generally communicates the
student’s ideas, a
lthough errors in
grammar, discipline-specific style,
and organization distract or confuse
the reader.
•
Competently communicates the
student’s ideas,
although there
may be some errors in grammar,
discipline-specific style, and
organization.
•
Competently communicates the
student’s ideas,
although there
may be some errors in grammar,
discipline-specific style, and
organization.
•
Enhances the communication of
the s
tudent’s ideas through
organization, use of design
elements, conventions of grammar,
style, mechanics, and word
precision, with few to no errors.
• Cites AND/OR attributes
sou
rces (in bibliography/works
cited and/or in-text), with
multiple errors and/or an
inconsistent use of a
discipline-specific style.
•
Cites AND/OR attributes sources (in
bibl
iography/works cited and/or in-
text), with multiple errors and/or an
inconsistent use of a discipline-
specific style.
• Cites AND attributes sources,
using a disci
pline-specific style
(in both bibliography/works cited
AND in-text), with few errors or
inconsistencies.
• Cites AND attributes sources,
with a c
onsistent use of an
appropriate discipline-specific
style (in both
bibliography/works cited AND in-
text), with few to no errors.
•
Cites AND attributes sources, with
a c
onsistent use of an appropriate
discipline-specific style (in both
bibliography/works cited AND in-
text), with few to no errors.
© 2017 The College Board