26
THE TIME IS NOW — ADDRESSING THE GENDER DIMENSIONS OF CORRUPTION
1.1.2 Gendered corruption patterns
In the years following their publication, the two World Bank studies were embraced in public
policy circles.
23
Meanwhile, feminists cautioned against framing women’s participation in politics
and business as a tool to ght corruption as opposed to a goal in itself.
24
Academics picked holes
in the studies. One of the early doubters, Sung
25
, suggested that the pattern was spurious, and only
apparent in the data because the initial analyses had not fully considered the role of democracy.
is argument proposed that democracy — rather than having more women in power — was
what really mattered for lowering corruption. e author postulated that it is democracy that
simultaneously promotes good governance and gender equality, thus opening professional doors
for women who want to become politicians. To support this argument, Sung showed that if the
inuences of the strength of the rule of law, of press freedom, and the existence of free and fair
elections in the analyses were taken into account, there was no discernible correlation between
women in power and corruption.
26
Other scholars questioned the universality of the trend by
deploying alternative statistical approaches.
27
As this follow-up research has burgeoned, the idea
that a greater proportion of women always goes hand in hand with less corruption has been
discarded,
28
while research showing that the pattern exists in some contexts but not in others has
gained credence. erefore, innate dierences between men and women cannot be responsible for
the association — else the correlation between national corruption levels and women in power
would be found everywhere.
Picking up Sung’s point that democracies provide a more open means of attaining political power
than autocracies, and that there are aspects in which the contest for power can be gendered, Esarey
and Chirillo asked whether the proportion of female legislators is equally good at predicting
corruption levels in both regime types.
29
ey found a strong correlation in democracies, but none in
autocracies. Stensöta et al
30
, meanwhile, explored the details of whether the pattern existed in state
administrations. e authors reasoned that public administrations, by their nature, are organizations
23 King, E. and Mason, A. (2001). Engendering Development rough Gender Equality in Rights, Resources,
And Voice. [online] Washington, D.C.: World Bank. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/
en/512911468327401785/Engendering-development-through-gender-equality-in-rights-resources-and-voice.
24 Goetz, A. M. (2007). Political Cleaners: Women as the New Anti-Corruption Force? Development & Change,
38(1), pp.87–105.
25 Sung, H. (2003). Fairer Sex or Fairer System? Gender and Corruption Revisited. Social Forces, 82(2), pp.703–723.
26 In 2012, he analysed changes between 1998 and 2004 in women’s parliamentary presence and in measures of
corruption, and found that a rise in female legislators does not predict a reduction in corruption over time
(as opposed to assessing the static pattern) when these factors are considered. See: Sung, H. (2012). Women in
government, public corruption, and liberal democracy: a panel analysis. Crime, Law and Social Change, 58(3),
pp.195–219.
27 For example, using ‘xed eects’ models: Debski, J., Jetter, M., Mösle, S. and Stadelmann, D. (2018). Gender
and corruption: e neglected role of culture. European Journal of Political Economy, 55, pp.526–537.
28 Yu Hao et al recently showed that population sex ratios are irrelevant for predicting corruption levels. See:
Hao, Y., Chang, C.-P. and Sun, Z. (2017). Women and corruption: evidence from multinational panel data.
Quality & Quantity, 52(4), pp.1447–1468.
29 Using data from 157 countries, between 1998 and 2007. See: Esarey, J. and Chirillo, G. (2013). “Fairer Sex” or
Purity Myth? Corruption, Gender, and Institutional Context.Politics & Gender, 9(04), pp.361–389.
30 Stensöta, H., Wängnerud, L. and Svensson, R. Gender and Corruption: e Mediating Power of Institutional
Logics. Governance, 28(4), (2014), pp.475–496.