It is worth highlighting that a high ranking on this hierarchy does not necessarily mean all kerbside space
should be allocated to that user group. Rather, it means that user group should be considered first and if their
needs are evaluated to have been met, then other user groups lower in the hierarchy should be considered.
For example, a high public transport priority in residential areas does not mean all space should be given to a
bus stop. If there is no bus route, then the local authority can then consider the next user group on the list
such as parking for residents. However, if a bus stop needed to be expanded due to operational adjustments
and some unrestricted parking spaces used primarily by residents needed to be acquired, then the
application of the hierarchy would mean the bus stop should take precedence.
The application of this parking management hierarchy also offers guidance for the management of narrow
kerbside space on narrow streets. For instance, it states that safety, property access and footpath provision
should be the three highest priorities for residential streets. Accordingly, on narrow streets (e.g. those less
than 6.0 m in carriageway width), the safety of all road users, access to properties (e.g. for residents’ cars
and emergency vehicles) as well as providing footpaths should be prioritised.
It is understood that through the ratification of Council’s Integrated Transport Strategy at the Extraordinary
Council Meeting on 3 March 2020, Council’s longstanding practice of allowing vehicle parking over footpaths
on narrow streets in selected suburbs such as Balmain East can also be rolled out LGA-wide. Adopting the
recommended hierarchy would not be in conflict with this policy. The hierarchy only states that safety,
property access and footpaths should be considered before vehicle parking for residents. In this regard,
where all three aspects can be provided in a narrow street, then vehicle parking can continue to be provided.
5.3.2. Residential Parking in Balmain East
Permit Cap
Based on the review and analysis of the parking surveys undertaken in February 2020, the high occupancy
rate along with longer average durations of stay in some residential streets may be a function of high demand
as well as the overallocation of residential parking permits relative to total parking capacity.
In fact, it is contrary to the mandatory Roads and Maritime permit parking guideline to issue more parking
permits than total parking capacity. As residential parking permits are reset throughout the LGA under the
soon-to-be-adopted Public Domain Parking Policy, it is recommended to at least cap the number of resident
parking permits to capacity or a 1:1 parking space to permits ratio, if not lower for Balmain East and all other
areas that have a resident parking permit scheme.
Resident Parking Permit Scheme
Aside from the permit cap recommendation, given the predominant residential character of the study area
and the need to supply parking for residents’ vehicles as most properties do not have off-street parking, it is
recommended that the existing BE resident permit parking scheme be continued under the new regime of the
Public Domain Parking Policy.
In terms of which zone (Zone Type A or Zone Type B) of the new regime should be implemented in Balmain
East, it is recommended that Balmain East changes from Zone Type B to Type A, meaning only those
dwellings without an off-street parking space is eligible for one permit only and any dwelling with one parking
space or more is ineligible for a permit. This recommendation is based on the predominance of narrow
streets and a premium of parking throughout the study area and the need to ensure the quantum of permits
issued do not exceed capacity. Assuming a 100 per cent of capacity permit cap, implementing Zone Type A
will result in fewer permits issued but across more eligible households, freeing up more space on-street for
those residents without any off-street parking, as well as for visitors (see sub-section below).