BOG (Board of Governors) Report
By Dixie Martinelli, BOG Representative
Dixie reported the board met on June 15-16. She did not attend Thursday due to not feeling
well but did attend on Friday. On Thursday, they toured the new Heart Institute and Bonnie’s
Bus. Friday consisted of committee meetings in the morning with a lengthy afternoon session
discussing the budget. She advised the board to take any matters that affect classified staff
very seriously which she believes they will.
Cris DeBord, VP for Talent & Culture, gave a presentation on the new HR governing policies
which will be called the BOG Rules which should be finalized in early September. He confirmed
the board will have the authority to change anything in the policy draft they do not agree with
before it becomes a Rule.
He informed them of the workshops and open meetings that HR has offered which they will
likely continue offering, as well as the ongoing mandatory supervisor training workshops for
employee evaluations.
Our point factor system will be eliminated and instead will be a performance driven evaluation to
determine future increases. As she understood it, if you are not a high performance employee,
you will not get an increase and may even be let go. As one board member pointed out, there
are middle-of-the-road employees who may be great with students but may not be the highest
performers.
With all these new items, she suggested developing a Peer Committee in each department to
oversee the supervisors’ employee evaluations. A few board members agreed. Cris indicated
they could have these committees for one year to ensure supervisors are evaluating on an
equal level. She asked Staff Council’s input regarding this.
Thomas Flaherty will be stepping down as chair and Bill Wilmouth will serve as chair beginning
July 1 which will be a two year term. She suggested to both of them to possibly have an outside
council review these proposed policies for input. They thought it was a good idea. She and
Lisa could follow-up with Thomas as he knows of someone that could look over it.
The Council agrees the Peer Committee is a great idea. Amber added they would have to
consider confidentiality. Dixie understands there are some employees who will not want their
evaluations looked at but at the same time, we must trust the Peer Committee to ensure all
classified staff are treated fairly.
Amber added the new process will monitor and track the evaluations and produce reports of the
data. The Council can propose a Peer Committee to the board and Cris if they feel it is
necessary.
Amber shared the following timeline regarding the forthcoming Performance Evaluations:
• They’ve been developing a new electronic system and began training this week.
• Four employee training sessions are in the works for the first or second week in July.
• Employees and their supervisors will receive an email on July 17 notifying the employee
that the pre-review is open and have ten days to complete – until July 28.
3