Page 55
NHS Pension Scheme Annual Report & Accounts 2022-2023
that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs (UK) will always detect a material misstatement
when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if,
individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic
decisions of users taken on the basis of these financial statements.
Extent to which the audit was considered capable of detecting non-compliance with laws
and regulations, including fraud
I design procedures in line with my responsibilities, outlined above, to detect material
misstatements in respect of non-compliance with laws and regulations, including fraud. The extent
to which my procedures are capable of detecting non-compliance with laws and regulations,
including fraud is detailed below.
Identifying and assessing potential risks related to non-compliance with laws and
regulations, including fraud
In identifying and assessing risks of material misstatement in respect of non-compliance with laws
and regulations, including fraud, I:
• Considered the nature of the sector, control environment and operational performance
including the design of the Scheme‘s accounting policies.
• Inquired of management, the Scheme’s head of internal audit and those charged with
governance, including obtaining and reviewing supporting documentation relating to the
Scheme’s policies and procedures on:
o identifying, evaluating, and complying with laws and regulations;
o detecting and responding to the risks of fraud; and
o the internal controls established to mitigate risks related to fraud or non-
compliance with laws and regulations including the Scheme’s controls relating to
the Scheme’s compliance with the Government Resources and Accounts Act
2000, Supply and Appropriation (Main Estimates) Act 2022, Managing Public
Money, the regulations set by The Pensions Regulator, NHS Pensions Scheme
Regulations 1995, 2008 and 2015, as amended, the NHS (Compensation for
Premature Retirement) Regulations 2002, as amended, and the Public Service
Pensions Act 2013.
• Inquired of management, the Scheme’s head of internal audit and those charged with
governance whether:
o they were aware of any instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations;
o they had knowledge of any actual, suspected, or alleged fraud,
• Discussed with the engagement team and the relevant internal and external specialists,
including actuarial specialists, regarding how and where fraud might occur in the financial
statements and any potential indicators of fraud.
As a result of these procedures, I considered the opportunities and incentives that may exist within
the Scheme for fraud and identified the greatest potential for fraud in the following areas: posting of
unusual journals, complex transactions, bias in management estimates and the selection of
inappropriate assumptions or methodology underpinning the pensions liability and related
estimates and the payment of benefits to ineligible members. In common with all audits under ISAs
(UK), I am required to perform specific procedures to respond to the risk of management override.
I obtained an understanding of the Scheme’s framework of authority and other legal and regulatory
frameworks in which the Scheme operates. I focused on those laws and regulations that had a