Alliance for Healthier Communities Communications Guide | 2
Guidelines
- Don’t reduce people to their social or medical conditions: avoid referring to people as the
homeless, the poor, the disabled, the drug user, etc. Homelessness, poverty, disability or drug
use are only one aspect of people’s lives. They are also parents, children, friends, artists,
writers, professionals, workers, and so on. When we use the adjective that describes their
social or medical condition and turn it into a noun to refer to people, we erase the other facets
of their lives and rob them of their humanity.
- Use people-first language. The concept of “person-first language” emerged among disability
advocacy groups in the 1980s. The movement’s objective was to use language in a way that
allowed people with disabilities and/or particular diagnoses to reclaim their agency, autonomy,
and personhood in the face of stigma and dehumanization. The rule is to put the word “person”
first, before the disability or condition, in order to emphasize that those being referred to are
people first, not just diagnoses or disabilities. In addition, when we put an adjective before the
noun, for example a disabled person, it implies that the whole person is disabled, which is
usually not the case. That is why “a person with disabilities” is a preferred term. The concept
person-first language has since grown beyond the disability community and can be used when
referring to many groups facing barriers. So try using “people experiencing homelessness” or
“people living in the streets” instead of “the homeless,” “a person living below the poverty line”
instead of “the poor,” “people who use drugs” instead of “drug users.”
- Our aim should be to shift focus from people to the systems that create inequities. When we
call people vulnerable or at-risk, it implies there is something inherently wrong with them and
because of that, they cannot deal with their life circumstances. We know that it is government
policies that make people vulnerable to poverty, food insecurity, inadequate housing, and at
risk of poor health. So it makes more sense to say “people made vulnerable to poverty”,
“people disadvantaged by the system”, “communities facing barriers” or to talk directly about
policies that put people at risk of poor health.
- Be as specific as possible. Quite often we refer to large, generic groups of people when we
mean much smaller communities. Using specific and clearly defined terms will help get the
message across as well as avoid lumping different groups of people together. Try to specify who
you mean by disabled people: is it people with mobility issues, deaf people, etc. When you talk
about at-risk youth, do you mean youth living in inner suburbs, youth from families living on
low incomes, newcomer youth, etc.?